Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1991 )


Menu:
  •                                 QMficeof the ~ttornep QZSeneral
    State      of llCexa$
    January       30,   1991
    Mr. William Tenison                                  Opinion No.    DM-1
    chairman
    On-Site Wastewater Treatment                       Re: Authority of the On-Site Wastewater
    Research Council                                Treatment Research Council, and related
    P. 0. Box 1088                                     questions (RQ-2165)
    Austin, Texas 78767
    Dear h4r. Tenison:
    Chapter 367 of the Health and Safety Code provides for the awarding of grants of
    state funds by the On-Site Wastewater Treatment Research Council (hereinafter the
    “council”) for support of research and for dissemination of information relating to on-site
    wastewater treatment technology. The provisions now in chapter 367 were adopted in
    1987 as article 4477-7c V.T.C.S., and codified in the Health and Safety Code in 1989. Acts
    1987,7Oth Leg., 2d C.S., ch. 28; Acts 1989,71st Leg., ch. 67% 9 1, at 2230.
    The council is composed of 11 members appointed by the governor. Health &
    Safety Code 8 367.002. Grants or other expenditures made by the council are payable
    from the on-site wastewater treatment research account in the general revenue fund. Fees
    collected by various entities for the issuance of on-site wastewater treatment permits are
    forwarded to the Department of Health and deposited to the credit of such account. rd.
    @367.008(c), 367.010.
    You ask first about section 367.007, which provides:
    (a) The   [Department    of Health]       shall implement   council
    decisions.
    (b) The council may enter into an interagency contract with the
    department to provide staff and other administrative support as
    required.
    (c) Administrative costs are payable from the on-site wastewater
    treatment research account.
    P.     1
    Mr. William Tenison - Page 2       (~~-11
    You ask whether the council may obtain administrative support only under the provisions
    of section 367.007 from the Department of Health. You argue that the permissive
    language of section 367.007(b) and provisions elsewhere for interagency contracts give the
    council authority to contract with other entities for administrative support services. We
    disagree.
    We think the legislature has in section 367.007 identified the Department of Health
    as the appropriate source for administrative support if the council needs it. If the
    legislature had intended that the council could contract with entities other than the
    Department of Health for administrative support, section 367.007(b) would have been
    superfhrous. The express authorization for council contracts with the Department of
    Health for administrative support indicates a lack of council authority to contract with
    other entities for such support services. &e State . Mauritz-Wells Co., 
    175 S.W.2d 238
    (Tex. 1943) (reciting rule of statutory construction tilt express enumeration or mention of
    one thing is equivalent to express exclwion of others not mentioned). We note, too, that
    the Committee on Natural Resources Bill Analysis to House Bill 32, 70th Leg., 2d C.S.,
    (1987), the bill originally adding the provisions now in chapter 367, states that the bill “pro-
    vides that the Texas Department of Health shall provide staff services for the council.”
    Your second question is whether the council must “pay”the Department of Health
    for services the council contracts for under section 367.007. We thii that the legislature’s
    use of the term “contract” in section 367.007(b) indicates that the legislature intended that
    the council would furnish consideration to the Department of Health for services the
    council obtains under section 367.007(b) from the department. This conclusion is support-
    ed by the succeeding provision, in subsection (c) of section 367.007, that “administrative
    costs are payable from the on-site wastewater treatment research account.”
    Given our affirmative response to your first question, we need not address your
    third question.
    Your fourth question is whether “administrative support” would include “technical
    review and/or testing of grant proposals” or “a base on which to conduct research subject to
    a grant.” We think that the language of section 367.007(b) providing that the council may
    contract with the Department of Health “to provide staff and other administrative support
    as required” encompasses all services necessary to the counc$s performance of its duties
    under chapter 367.
    The duties of the council under chapter 367 are essentially to award grants as
    provided for in section 367.008 of the Health and Safety Code. That section reads:
    P.   2
    Mr. William Tenison - Page 3      (~~-11
    (a) The council shall establish procedures            for   awarding
    competitive grants and disbursing grant money.
    (b) The council may award competitive grants to:
    (1) support applied research at accredited colleges and
    universities in this state regarding on-site wastewater treatment
    technology and systems applicable to this state that are directed
    toward improving the quality of wastewater treatment and
    reducing the cost of providing wastewater treatment to
    consumers; and
    (2) enhance technology transfer regarding on-site wastewater
    treatment by using educational courses, seminars, symposia,
    publications, and other forms of information dissemination.
    (c) The council may award grants or make other expenditures
    authorized under this chapter only after the comptroller certifies that
    the on-site wastewater treatment research account contains enough
    money to pay for those expenditures.
    Clearly, the council’s duties to award grants under section 367.008 will involve the
    council’s evaluation of grant proposals. Where such evaluations require “technical review
    and/or testing” of proposals, we think such services may be obtained from the Department
    of Health under the provisions of section 367.007 regarding contracts for “administrative
    support.”
    However, we do not think that the council may, under the provisions of section
    367.007 relating to “administrative support,” acquire or contract for the availability of “a
    base on which to conduct research subject to a grant.” Chapter 367 authorizes the council
    to award grant money. It does not authorize the council to directly provide physical
    facilities to grantees. As will be discussed below, in regard to your fifth question, we think
    that grant recipients may spend grant money awarded under section 367.008(b) to obtain
    the use of such facilities for research purposes.
    Your fii question is whether the council may “provide for research support
    services” through a grant. The council’s authority to award grants is limited by section
    367.008(b) to grants that support applied research at colleges and universities and to
    enhance technology transfer by information dissemination. Whether the council may
    award a grant for the provision of “research support services” would depend on whether
    P-   3
    Mr. William Tenison - Page 4           (~~-11
    such “research support” constituted applied research or information dissemination under
    section 367.008(b), and would involve questions of fact as to the nature of the “research
    support” for which the award of a grant was contemplated.
    You suggest in your brief that the council might wish to award grant money to the
    Center for Environmental Research (hereinafter “CER”), a project of the city of Austin, for
    provision of specialized support services. You say CER is “affiliated with several
    accredited universities.” If the services provided under such grant were ones which
    enhanced technology transfer through information dissemination, under section
    367.008(b)(2), such a grant would be within the council’s authority. As to those grants
    which are not for information dissemination, you do not explain what you mean by the
    phrase “affiliated with,” but apparently CER is not under the control of an accredited
    college or university. The only authority for the council to award grant money other than
    for information dissemination under section 367.008(b)(2) is under subsection (h)(l) of
    section 367.008 for “applied research at accredited colleges and universities.“1 We note, on
    the other hand, that we find nothing in chapter 367 which would prevent a grant recipient
    under section 367.008, if permitted under the terms of the grant, from himself using grant
    money to acquire services from CER in support of his grant-funded research or
    information dissemination.
    In light of our response to your first question, we need not address your last
    question.
    SUMMARY
    The On-Site Wastewater Treatment Research Council may
    contract for administrative support only from the Department of
    Health pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 367.007(b), and
    the council must furnish consideration to the department for the
    furnishing of such services by the latter.
    Such administrative support may include technical review or
    testing of grant proposals but not provision of facilities for the conduct
    of grant-supported research.
    1.     We note, however, in response to the coocenu you raise in your brief, that we do not think section
    367.CHlS(b)(l) requires that all grant-funded research under that provision literally be performed “at” such
    institutions. We think such grants may bc awarded, for example, for the condua of research under the auspices
    of such institutions ewen though the physical sites of the rcsearcb is at other facilities.
    P.   4
    Mr. William Tenison - Page 5       (DM-1)
    Whether the council may award a grant for “research support”
    would depend on whether, as a factual matter, such “research
    support” was applied research at an accredited college or university
    regarding on-site wastewater treatment technology, or was
    information dissemination regarding such technology.
    DAN      MORALES
    Attorney General of Texas
    WILL PRYOR
    First Assistant Attorney General
    MARY KELLER
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    RENEAHICKS
    Special Assistant Attorney General
    SUSAN GARRISON
    Chairman, Opinion Committee
    Prepared by William Walker
    Assistant Attorney General
    

Document Info

Docket Number: DM-1

Judges: Dan Morales

Filed Date: 7/2/1991

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017