Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1987 )


Menu:
  • Honorable Rayford A. Ratliff             Opinion No.   JM-795
    Moore County Attorney
    P. 0. Box 634                            Re: Whether a person who is licensed
    Dumas, Texas   79029                     under the plumbing license law,
    article 6243-101, V.T.C.S., is exempt
    from the provisions of article 8861,
    V.T.C.S.
    Dear Mr. Ratliff:
    You ask whether a person who is licensed under the Plumbing
    License Law, article 6342-101. V.T.C.S;, is exempted from the
    provisions of the Air Conditioning Contractor License Law, article
    8861, V.T.C.S. We conclude that licensed plumbers are exempted from
    the provisions of article 8861 to the extent that plumbing services
    fall within the definitions of air conditioning contracting or air
    conditioning maintenance work. The extent to which plumbing services
    constitute air conditioning contracting or maintenance work is a fact
    question which cannot be answered in an Attorney General's Opinion.
    Article 8861. V.T.C.S., governs the licensure and regulation of
    air conditioning contractors. It establishes two classes of air
    conditioning contractor licenses, section 4(a). and empowers the
    commissioner of the Texas Department of Labor and Standards to adopt
    rules for the practice of air conditioning contracting consistent with
    the act. V.T.C.S. art. 8861, §3(a). Section 2 of the act defines the
    following relevant terms:
    Sec. 2.           In this Act:
    .     .   .   .
    (2) 'Air conditioning contractor' means a
    person licensed un'der this Act who designs,
    installs,    constructs,   maintains,   services,
    repairs,   alters,   or  modifies   any  heating,
    ventilating, or air conditioning product, system,
    or equipment.
    (3) 'Air   conditioning   contracting' means
    designing, installing, constructing, maintaining,
    servicing, repairing, altering, or modifying any
    heating, ventilating, or air conditioning product,
    system, or equipment. The term does not include
    p. 3756
    Honorable Rayford A. Ratliff - Page 2   (m-795)
    the design, installation, construction, main-
    tenance, service, repair, alteration, or modifica-
    tion of a portable or self-contained ductless air
    conditioning or heating product that has a cooling
    capacity of three tons or less or a heating
    capacity of 36,000 British thermal units or less.
    .   .   .   .
    (6)  'Air conditioning maintenance work' means
    repair work and all other work required for .the
    continued normal performance of a heating,
    ventilating, or air conditioning system. The term
    does not include the installation of a total
    replacement of the system or the installation of
    boilers or pressure vessels that must be installed
    by licensed persons pursuant to rules and regula-
    tions promulgated by the Texas Department of Labor
    and Standards under the Texas boiler inspection
    law, Chapter 436, Acts of the 45th Legislature,
    Regular Session, 1937 (Article 5221c, Vernon's
    Texas Civil Statutes).
    The act provides a number of exemptions for persons meeting
    _                       ..
    stipulated criteria. The purpose Ot these exemptions 1s dlSCUSSea
    later in this opinion. The exemption relevant to your inquiry is
    section 6(a)(4) which states "[tlhis Act does not apply to a person
    who . . . performs plumbing work and is 'licensed under The Plumbing
    License Law (Article 6243-101, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes)." A
    rule promulgated by the Department of Labor and Standards in 1986
    attempts to clarify this exemption:
    575.8 Exemptions.
    (a) The Act and its rules and regulations do
    not apply to a person who:
    . . . .
    (4) performs plumbing work and is licensed
    under the Plumbing License Law, Texas Civil
    Statutes, 'Article 6243-101. A person licensed
    under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 8861, may not
    perform or offer or attempt to perform any act,
    service, or function that is defined as plumbing
    work under the Plumbing License Law, unless
    licensed under that law. A person who is licensed
    in this state as a plumber, and is engaged in
    business as a plumber, may not perform or offer or
    attempt to perform air conditioning contracting,
    unless licensed under this Act. . . . (Emphasis
    added.)
    p. 3757
    Honorable Rayford A. Ratliff - Page 3   (JM-795)
    11 Tex. Reg. 593 (1986) (amending 16 T.A.C. 575.8(a)(4)). You believe
    this rule is in conflict with the exemption provided in section
    6(a)(4) of article 8861, as it imposes additional requirements and
    places a greater burden on licensed plumbers than the statute does.
    Your request presents questions of statutory construction and
    administrative rulemaking authority. The cardinal rule of statutory
    interpretation is to ascertain legislative intent. Minton v. Frank,
    
    554 S.W.2d 442
    (Tex. 1976). If possible, legislative intent is
    determined from the language of the statute. Crimmins v. Lowry, 
    691 S.W.2d 582
    (Tex. 1985). The entire statute, and not merely isolated
    portions of it, must be examined. State v. Terrell. 
    588 S.W.2d 784
    (Tex. 1979).
    If the meaning of a statutory provision is doubtful or ambiguous,
    the construction placed thereon by the agency charged with administra-
    tion of the statute is given weight. See Calvert v. Kadane, 
    427 S.W.2d 605
    (Tex. 1968). An agency's consi;;ction of a statute is not
    controlling, however. Bullock v. Ramada Texas, Inc., 
    609 S.W.2d 537
    (Tex. 1980). It is valid only insofar as it is consistent with
    statutory language and will not be allowed the effect of expanding or
    contracting the language of the statute. See Firestone Tire and
    Rubber Co. v. Bullock, 
    573 S.W.2d 489
    , 500 n.      (Tex. 1978). Also,
    rules and regulations adopted by an administrative agency may not
    impose additional burdens, restrictions, or conditions in excess of or
    inconsistent with statutory provisions. Bexar County Bail Bond Board
    v. Deckard, 
    604 S.W.2d 214
    . 216 (Tex. Civ. App. - San Antonio 1980, no
    writ).
    The language of section 6(a)(4) has inspired two conflicting
    interpretations. The first, offered.on behalf of the Department of
    Labor and Standards, is premised on the belief that the practice of
    plumbing and the practice of air conditioning contracting are separate
    and distinct crafts,. each requiring different training, qualifica-
    tions, and testing for licensure. The legislature, in apparent
    recognition of this belief, chose not to include "plumbing work"
    within the definition of air conditioning contracting; therefore,
    plumbing work should not be considered a part of the practice of air
    conditioning contracting. The act exempts licensed plumbers who
    perform "plumbing work" from its coverage.       It does not exempt
    licensed plumbers who perform "air conditioning contracting." Thus,
    it is argued that it is reasonable for the department to require a
    licensed plumber to obtain a license to practice air conditioning
    contracting. In doing so, the department contends that it is acting
    consistently with the legislature's decision to treat plumbing and air
    conditioning contracting as mutually exclusive crafts.
    You read section 6(a)(4) differently. You contend that the
    effect of this provision is to completely remove licensed plumbers
    from the reach of article 8861. The State Board of Plumbing Examiners
    informs us that many of its licensees agree with your interpretation
    of section 6(a)(4). The board notes that plumbers have traditionally
    p. 3758
    Honorable Rayford A. Ratliff - Page 4 (JM-795)
    installed heating equipment such as floor furnaces, wall heaters,
    radiant heaters, and suspended heaters with self-contained blowers.
    The suggestion is that the skills required to install heating equip-
    ment are comparable to the skills required to install air conditioning
    systems. Thus, it is argued, a licensed plumber need not obtain an
    air conditioner contractor's license prior to contracting for the
    installation or maintenance of air conditioning equipment.
    In our opinion, neither interpretation adequately represents
    legislative intent. We believe the real meaning of section 6(a)(4)
    lies somewhere between the narrow reading offered by the department
    and the broad interpretation you advocate.
    The department's interpretation of section 6(a)(4) is too
    restrictive because it fails to acknowledge the legislature's
    conclusion that aspects of the practice of plumbing might also be
    considered acts of air conditioning contracting as that term is
    defined in article 8861. Clearly, the legislature did not share the
    belief that plumbing and air conditioning contracting are mutually
    exclusive trades, for if it had, no exception for licensed plumbers
    would be necessary. No real purpose would be served by exempting
    persons who provide services which are not among the services
    regulated by article 8861. In effect, the department's construction
    of section 6(a)(4) renders the provision superfluous.
    Your reading of section 6(a)(4), however, overestimates the
    breadth of the exemption provided for licensed plumbers. If the
    legislature had intended to authorize licensed plumbers to perform all
    aspects of air conditioning contracting, it could have done so in
    express terms. Notably, the other provisions of section 6(e) provide
    exemptions for persons who perform "air conditioning work," "air
    conditioning maintenance work," or 'air conditioning contracting."
    Section 6(a)(4) is the only exception not phrased in these terms. In
    order to es'tablishthe proper scope of section 6(a)(4), we must first
    determine the meaning of the term "plumbing work." We believe the
    source of the phrase is article 6342-101. See L 6 M-Surco Mfg., Inc.
    v. Winn Tile Co., 
    580 S.W.2d 920
    (Tex. Civ. App. - Tyler 1979, writ
    dism'd) (in construing statutory word or phrase, court may take into
    consideration meaning of same or similar language used in another.act
    of similar nature); see also Gov't Code 9312.002(b) (word connected
    with or used with reference to a particular trade as a word of art
    shall have meaning given by experts in the trade).
    Neither article 8861 nor article 6342-101 defines 'plumbing
    work." The Plumbing License Law does, however, supply the relevant
    definition:
    Sec. 2. (a) The word or term 'plumbing' as
    used in this Act means and shall include: (1)
    All piping, fixtures, appurtenances and appliances
    for supply or recirculation of water, gas,
    liquids, and drainage or elimination of sewage,
    p. 3759
    Honorable Rayford A. Ratliff - Page 5 (JM-795)
    including disposal systems or any combination
    thereof, for all personal or domestic purposes in
    and about buildings where a person or persons
    live, work or assemble; all piping, fixtures,
    appurtenances and appliances outside a building
    connecting the building with the source of water,
    gas, or other liquid supply, or combinations
    thereof, on the premises, or the main in the
    street, alley or at the curb; all piping'
    fixtures, appurtenances, appliances, drain or
    waste pipes carrying waste water or sewage from or
    within a building to the sewer service lateral at
    the curb or in the street or alley or other
    disposal or septic terminal holding private or
    domestic sewage; (2) the installation, repair,
    service, and maintenance of all piping, fixtures,
    appurtenances and     appliances in    and   about
    buildings where a person or persons live, work or
    assemble, for a supply of gas, water, liquids, or
    any combination thereof, or disposal of waste
    water or sewage.
    V.T.C.S. art. 6342-101, 52(a). We believe that when the legislature
    used the term "plumbing work" in article 8861, it had in mind those
    services which comprise the practice of plumbing as it is defined in
    article 6342-101. Therefore, we conclude that licensed plumbers are
    exempted from the provisions of article 8861 to the extent that they
    provide plumbing services which1 may also be classified as air
    conditioning contracting services.
    When the legislature has provided exemptions from the licensing
    or registration requirements of regulatory statutes, this office has
    consistently construed these exemptions narrowly. As a general rule,
    such exemptions are construed to permit only acts which may be
    performed within the terms of the particular exemption or within the
    1. This conclusion only affects licensed plumbers who are not
    regulated by municipalities. Article 8861 does not require all
    persons engaged in the business of air conditioning contracting to
    obtain a license from the department. Section 8 of the act provides
    that the penalty for persons who engage in air conditioning
    contracting without a license issued under the act is not applicable
    to persons who hold licenses issued by municipalities. Section 9
    states that a license issued by a municipality is valid under the
    terms of the license within that municipality. Therefore, any person
    (including a licensed plumber) providing air conditioning contracting
    or maintenance services may avoid the licensing and penalty provisions
    of article 8861 by obtaining a license from a municipality and
    providing such services only within that municipality.
    p. 3760
    Honorable Rayford A. Latliff - Page 6      (X-795)
    scope of the act under which the exempted individuals are already
    regulated. For example, in Attorney General Opinion R-814 (1976) this
    office concluded that members of the professions exempted from article
    249c, V.T.C.S. (regulating landscape architects), need not comply with
    the provisions of the act while engaged within the ordinary and proper
    scope of their respective professions, even though their activities
    might Include some aspect of landscape architecture. The attorney
    general reasoned that the primary purpose of article 249~ was to
    protect the public and determined that it would be inconsistent with
    that purpose to permit a person whose familiarity with the subject of
    landscape architecture might only be peripheral to hold himself out to
    the public as competent in all aspects of that profession. In
    Attorney General Opinion W-384     (1981) it was said that although
    persons employed in industry as engineers are exempted from the
    licensing requirements of the Engineering Practice Act, article 3271a,
    V.T.C.S., they are not entirely exempted from the scope of the act.
    The exemption under consideration was provided for persons who do not
    have "final authority for the approval of, and the ultimate
    responsibility for, engineering designs, plans or specifications."
    V.T.C.S. art. 3271a. $20(g). Thus, it could not be viewed as
    authorizing such persons to practice engineering. Attorney General
    Opinion MW-555 (1982) observed that persons holding a master's degree
    or doctorate in audiology are exempted from the examination and
    licensing provisions of article 4566, V.T.C.S., to the extent that
    they perform the functions enumerated in the exemption, article
    4566-1.19(3), V.T.C.S.      The   functions   described   in   article
    4566-1.19(3) comprised part of the services defined in article
    4566-1.01(f) as "[flitting and [dlispensing hearing aids."         The
    opinion concluded that persons with such credentials were not exempt
    from the provisions of article 4566 if they performed any of the other
    services set forth in article 4566-1.01(f). In Attorney General
    Opinion MU-410 (1981). an exception provided in the Texas Pharmacy
    Act,   article   4542a-1, V.T.C.S.,     for  medical   or   veterinary
    practitioners who dispense prescription drugs to their own patients
    was narrowly interpreted. It was determined that practitioners who
    exceeded the terms of the exception would be required to obtain a
    pharmacist's license.
    In view of these authorities, it is reasonable to conclude that
    section 6(a)(4) of article 8861 authorizes licensed plumbers to
    provide only those services described in article 6342-101 which may
    incidentally be characterized as services coming within the defini-
    tions20f air conditioning contracting or air conditioning maintenance
    work.   The extent to which plumbing services constitute air condi-
    tioning contracting or maintenance work is a question of fact that
    cannot be resolved in the opinion process.      See Attorney General
    Opinion NOS. m-217 (1984); R-495 (1975). To the-tent    that plumbing
    2.   -See note 1, supra.
    p. 3761
    Honorable Rayford A. Ratliff - Page 7 (JM-795)
    services constitute air conditioning contracting or maintenance work,
    :he Department of Labor and Standards is without authority to
    promulsate a rule nrohibitinn licensed slumbers from serformins such
    .        I
    services. See Bexar County Bail Bond Board v. Deckard, supray cf.
    Attorney General Opinion H-495 (1975).
    SUMMARY
    Article   8861, section    6(a)(4), V.T.C.S..
    exempts licensed plumbers from the provisions of
    article 8861 only to the extent that plumbing
    services constitute services comprising the
    definitions of air conditioning contracting or air
    conditioning maintenance work.     The extent to
    which plumbing services constitute air condi-
    tioning contracting or maintenance work is a
    question of fact that cannot be resolved in the
    opinion process.    To the extent that plumbing
    services constitute air conditioning contracting
    or ~maintenance work, the Department of Labor and
    Standards is without authority to promulgate a
    rule which prohibits licensed plumbers from
    performing such services.
    JIM     MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    UARY KELLER
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAKLRY
    Special Assistant Attorney General
    RICK GILPIN
    Chairman, Opinion Committee
    Prepared by Rick Gilpin
    Assistant Attorney General
    p. 3762