Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1985 )


Menu:
  •                                  The Attomy                  General            of Texas
    June 11,       1985
    JIM MATTOX
    Attorney General
    suprems Ccucl MIdIn             Eonorabla William       L. yerguaon                 Opinion    lo.   m-332
    P.0. Box 12540                  County 6 District       Attorney
    Austin. TX. 79711.2545          Rusk County Courthouse                              Rc: Circumstances         under which a
    512/47,2591                     Benderson.     Texas      75652                     county my dispose          of abandoned
    Telex 01011M4-l357
    TelecQQler51214754m35
    rights-of-way
    Dear Hr. Perguaon:
    714 Jackam, sun0 790
    oanu. TX. 752024505
    You Inform ‘3s that              in Rusk County       several     roads  have       been
    214n42.9944
    abandoned by actico of the              cmlssionera      court.     The county clerk       does
    not have any records as to               hou the rights-of-way       for these roads       were
    4024Albna K+c..Suite 180        acquired    or est&lished                by    the  county,     but    these   roads       were
    El Pmo, lx. 789052792           established   many gears ago.              In that regard you ask:
    915icG34m
    Euv can the commissioners       court  of a count?
    lcol Texas. sune 700                         dispose   of abandoned rights;ofray       when there is
    nwrtm. TX. 77002~3111                        90 recotij   shoving  the method of acquisition      of
    71Y22%5855                                   such ri@ts-of-way?
    A county comadssioners     court has only the pavers conferred           either
    SW Broadway.SuNe 312
    expressly   or by at:cessary    implication      by the constitutfon     and statutes
    Lubbock,TX. 79401-3479
    mY747.5239                     of this state.      SW Tex. Const.
    --.                  art. V, 118; Canales v. Laughlin,          
    214 S.W.2d 451
    ,      453 ‘[Tex. 1948).         ThUS,    the cormnissioners      court    can
    dispose    of abanilctned right-of-way           property   only     where there      Is
    4399 H. Tenth. Sulle S
    statutory    or cons!:itutional   authorization       to do so.    
    Id. - McAllen,
    TX 79501-1885
    512sS24547
    Article      1577,      V.T.C.S.,         prwides       a    statutory       procedure
    authorizing      a county commlssionera             court to dispose       of real estate.
    200 MaIn Pbza, Suile 400        County roads and l:j.ghts-ofliay            are iuterests     in land.      See Anderson v.
    !jan Antonio, TX. 702052797
    Tall     Timbers     Cock,       
    378 S.W.2d 16
    (Tex.       1964). The         statute
    512i225-4181
    soecif%callv      authorizes      a commissioners        court to dispose       of abandoned
    “highway right-of -‘ray property.”                V.T.C.S.    art.    15j7.     It has been
    All EqualOPpcrtunilYl          held that a conve!frmee or disposition                of land owned by the county made
    Alflrmallve Action EmPlOYer    in any mode other ,than prescribed               by article     1577. V.T.C.S.,      is void.
    See Wilson v. Colzizof              Calhoun,      
    489 S.W.2d 393
    (Tex. Civ. App. -
    Corpus Christi        1972. writ ref’d          n.r.e.).      Moreover, a cosmisaioners
    court     has not been given           the authority        to douate any county-owned
    property       to private       indivjduals        or corporations.          See Conley        v.
    Daughtera of the :%I!ublic.            156 S.U. 197 (Tex. 1913); Attorney General
    Oplnioa M-62         (1979   .
    -+-X100.            owners of lands        surrounding     a road or
    right-of-way      cannot claim title          to them by adverse        possession      unless
    the road has been abandoned                 in compliance       with section 2.008 of
    p.    1518
    Eonorable      Uilliu   L. Terguaao     - Page 2        (JX-332)
    article       6702-l. V.T.C.8.     Cf.     V.T.C.8.    art.        5517; Attorney General
    Opinion       B-111 (1973)   (di&;~ing         predecessor          statute V.T.C.S. art.
    6703a).                                                                 .
    You indicated       that thlcre are no records           shoving      the method of
    acquisition      of the nou abandoned         right-of-way       property.       The schama
    outlined      in   article     157i.     V.T.C.S.,      makes      provlslons       for   the
    disposition      of right-of-va:r     property      even if there         are no official
    records     of how the property       was acquired.         The prerequisite          for the
    application      of article    1577, V.T.C.S.,        is that the property          is owned
    by the county at the time               of its     disposition.         Accordingly,      the
    cqxmissioners        court     may    dispose      of     the     abandoned       roads     or
    rights-of-way      only in the method outlined          in article      1577, V.T.C.S.
    SUMMARY
    Once a county bomanissioners       court has abandoned
    a road or right-of-way        in compliance     with article
    6702-l.    section    :!.008,   V.T.C.S.,     the court       is
    authorized    to   ili.spose    of   the    roads    only     in
    compliance with article        1577, V.T.C.S.,     regardless
    of the method of acquisition.
    JIM        IIATTOX
    Attorney     General   of Texas
    TOMGREEN
    First Assistant        Attorney   Goneral
    DAVID R. RICEAFDS
    Executive Assistant         Attormy     General
    ROBERTGRAY
    Special Assistant        Attorney     General
    RICR GILPIR
    Chairman, Opinion         Committe~c
    Prepared     by Tony Guillory
    Assistant     Attorney General
    p.    1519
    -*        .                                                                jt
    FZ-
    .       -
    &morable   William   L. Perguam   - Page 3 W-332)   :,
    APPROVRD:
    OPINIONCCMITPBE
    Rick Gilpin,   Chairman
    Colin Carl
    Susan Garrison
    Tony Guillory
    Jim Moellinger
    Jeunifer   Riggs
    Nancy Sutton
    Sarah Woelk
    p. 1520
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-332

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1985

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017