Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1981 )


Menu:
  •                       The Attorney              General of Texas
    April        10,    1981
    MARKWHITE
    Attorney General
    Honorable Carl A. Parker, Chairman             Opinion No. MW-319
    Senate Committee on Financial
    Institutions                                 Re: Whether article XVI, section
    P. 0. Box UO68                                 11 of the Texas Constitution
    Austin, Texas 78711                            requires that legislation tying the
    interest rate to a moving index fii
    an absolute maximum rate
    Dear Senator Parker:
    You ask whether article XVI, section ll of the Texas Constitution
    requires that an absolute maximum interest rate be fixed in all cases where
    the authorized rate is tied to a moving index. Article XVI, section 11
    provides in pertinent part:
    The Legislature shall have authority to.. . define
    interest and fix maxmum rates of interest; provided,
    however,    in the absence of legislation       fixing
    maximum rates of interest all contracts for a greater
    rate of interest gan ten per centum 00%) per annum
    shall be deemed usurious. . . .
    We believe your question is answered by Letter Advisory No. 146 (1977)
    issued by this office.    That letter addressed the question of whether the
    legislature could authorize   the Finance Commission to establish maximum
    interest rates for small loans. It stated as follows:
    Article 16, section 11autho&es the LegMature      ‘to
    fix’ maximum rates of interest. The word ‘fix’ has a
    variety   of meanings, depending upon the context. See
    Gist v. Rackliffe-Gibson     Const. Co., 
    123 S.W. 92I
                                  [MO.    19091 We
    .~~.~~~~~,~   ~~~ believe
    ~~~ the followine definition from
    Webster’s Second International DictLnary states the
    meaning of ‘fix’ as it appears in this constitutional
    provision:
    to set or place definitely;      to
    establish;. . . to determine;    to
    assign precisely.
    We note that Texas courts have assumed ‘fix’ in this
    provision to be interchangeable with ‘establish.’ -See
    p.   1024
    Honorable Carl A. Parker - Page Two      (MN- 319)
    Freeman v. Gonzales County Savings & Loan Ass’n, 
    526 S.W.2d 774
    , 777 (Tex. Civ. App. - Corpus Christi 1975) lafPd, 
    534 S.W. 2d
    903 (Tex. 197611; Home Savings Ass’n of Dallas County v.
    Crow, 514 SW. 2d 160, 165 (Tex. Civ. App. - Dallas 1974), ati’d,
    
    522 S.W.2d 457
    (Tex      1975). We believe the Constitz
    authorizes the Legislature to enact statutes establishing a
    precise figure as the maximum interest rate. If it does not
    enact such statutes, or if for other reasons there is no
    legislation fixing maximum interest rates for any class of
    transactions, the Constitution itself fries a ten percent
    maximum.
    In Attorney General Opinion MW-17 (19791, we considered the constitutionality of
    a bill which stated the interest rate as one percent more than the discount rate on 90-
    day commercial paper in effect on the day the loan is made. The bill, however, gave a
    minimum interest rate of 10% and a maximum rate of 12%. We found that the bill
    ‘Ifties an absolute maximum rate of interest, in that in no instance may the rate
    exceed 12 percent a year.” We noted that if the legislature wished to ensure the
    validity of the bill, it could draft a severability clause to render the 12 percent
    maximum applicable regardless of the validity of the other provisions.
    It is clear from Attorney General Opinion MW-17 and Letter Advisory No. 146
    that a numerical maximum interest rate must be stated in legislation which attempts
    to set the interest rate. We do not believe that the legislature would in fact fix the
    maximum interest rate if it were to enact a formula permitting the computation of
    maximum interest from economic indicators.         Such a statute might permit the
    computation of a precise maximum interest rate at any given time; however, it only
    fixes the interest rate in a relative sense. We believe the constitution requires the
    legislature to fix an absolute maximum interest rate.
    SUMMARY
    Article XVI, section 11 of the Texas Constitution requires
    that legislation fixing the Interest rate state a numerical
    maximum interest rate.
    A-
    MARK      WHITE
    Attorney General of Texas
    JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    RICHARD E. GRAY III
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    .   .
    Honorable Carl A. Parker - Psge Three   (MlrJ-319)
    Prepared by Susan L. Garrison
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMlTTEE
    Susan L. Garrison, Chairman
    Jon Bible
    Rick Gilpin
    ThomasM.Pollan
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-319

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1981

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017