Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1978 )


Menu:
  •        -      .
    The Attorney                 General of Texas
    July        20,   1978
    JOHN L. HILL
    Attorney General
    Honorable P. H. (Bub) McDowell                    Opinion No. H- 1211
    President & Chief Executive Officer
    East Texas State University                       Re: Authority     of East Texas
    Commerce, Texas 75428                             State University to establish a
    system administration.
    Dear President McDowell:
    You ask several questions regarding the authority of the Regents of
    East Texas State University to establish a system administration. Senate Bill
    598 enacted by the 65th Legislature is relevant to your questions. The bill
    provides in part:
    East Texas State University is a coeducational
    institution of higher education with its main campus
    located in the city of Commerce.
    Educ. Code S 100.01. Another section of the bill provides in part:
    The organization, control, and management of the
    university   is vested in a board of nine regents
    appointed by the governor with the advice and consent
    of the senate, but no regent may be a resident of the
    county in which the main campus is located, nor shall
    the Texarkana campus be organized to offer freshman
    or sophomore programs, and the metroplex commuter
    program may offer only those programs approved by
    the Coordinating Board, Texas College and University
    System and which are nonduplicative       of programs
    offered in the Dallas educational area. The board of
    regents may establish different rules for the operation
    of the facilities and programs in each location. . . .
    The board has the powers and duties incident to its
    position and to the same extent as is conferred on the
    Board of Regents of Texas Woman’s University.
    Educ. Code S 1OO.B The bill expressly stated that it did not authorize any
    new college, university, branch, or center. Acts 1977, 65th Leg., ch. 226, S 2,
    p.    4854
    .   .-
    Honorable F. H. (Bub) McDowell      -   Page 2      (~-1211)
    at 617. According to the bill analysis, it established in law the upper-level
    education center in Texarkana and the metroplex commuter program in Dallas,
    which were already operating under Coordinating Board approval. The bill confers
    on the Regents of East Texas State the powers incident to its position that are
    conferred on the Regents of the University of Texas. Educ. Code. SS lOO.ll, 107.41.
    With this background in mind, we turn to your questions.        You first ask
    whether the University has authority to acquire a building in the Dallas/Fort Worth
    area for the commuter program center. You now lease a building for this purpose,
    and inquire whether you may buy this or another building. You also ask whether
    you may acquire it through a leasepurchase       agreement. The Board of Regents has
    authority under section 55.ll of the Education Code “to acquire, purchase . . . any
    property, buildings, . . . or other facilities, for and on behalf of its institution or
    institutions, or any branch or branches thereof.” See Educ. Code SS 55.01, 61.003;
    Attorney General Opinions H-23 (1973); M-832 m71).            Article 61.058 of the
    Education Code provides that the Coordinating Board shall
    . . . .
    (5)   endorse, or delay until the next succeeding session of
    the legislature has the opportunity to approve or disapprove,
    the proposed purchase of any real property by an institution
    of higher education. . . .
    East Texas State University is subject to this provision.         See Educ. Code,
    SS 61.003(3), (4), (7). We believe that this provision requires thGpprova1  of the
    Coordinating Board or the Legislature before East Texas State may purchase the
    building. See Attorney General Opinions C-686, C-686A (1966).
    A rider to the General Appropriations        Act for the 1975-77 biennium
    authorized the Regents of East Texas State University to use bond proceeds, gifts
    or grants to acquire a commuter program center.         See Acts 1975, 64th Leg., ch.
    743, at 2768. This kind of rider has been held to authorize university construction
    projects without the consent of the Coordinating Board. Jessen Associates, Inc. v.
    Bullock, 
    531 S.W.2d 593
    (Tex. 1975). However, we do not believe a rider to the 1975-
    77 Appropriations Act provides current authorization        to purchase the building.
    Such riders merely direct the expenditure of appropriated funds since general
    legislation cannot be included in the appropriations act. Tex. Const. art. 3, S 35,
    Jessen Associates, Inc. v. Bullock, m,     at 601. The appropriation act to which the
    rider belonged was effective for a two year period, ending August 31, 1977. Tex.
    Const. art. 8, S 6; see Acts 1975, 64th Leg., ch. 743, at 2417. The appropriation for
    the acquisition of a building is no longer in effect, and, in our opinion, the rider
    attached to it has no independent existence.        Of course, an appropriation for a
    capital improvement that has been legally encumbered by contract during the
    biennium may be spent after the end of the biennium. Attorney General Opinion
    p.   4855
    *   .
    Honorable F. H. (Bub) McDowell      -        Page 3   (R-12 11)
    M-13 (1967); WW-40 (1957). In that case, we believe the rider would remain in effect
    along with the appropriation item.      You have not suggested that the Regents
    encumbered the 1975-77 appropriation by contracting to purchase the commuter
    program building. Therefore, we find no basis for concluding that the Regents have
    present authority to buy the building, either outright or by a lease-purchase
    agreement.
    You next ask whether East Texas State University has legislative authority
    to offer courses for resident credit in the Dallas/Fort Worth area through its
    commuter program center.        Section lOO.ll of the Education Code permits the
    metroplex commuter program to offer only those programs approved by the
    Coordinating Board which are nonduplicative of programs offered in the Dallas
    educational area.    The Regents may establish rules for the operation of the
    commuter program which apply only to that location.      Educ. Code S 1OO.L The
    Appropriation Act authorizes East Texas State to use appropriated funds to provide
    credit courses in the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex under criteria established by the
    Coordinating Board. In our opinion, the Regents of East Texas State have authority
    to offer courses for resident credit in the commuter program center under
    appropriate Regents’ rules, provided that the Coordinating Board approves the
    course offerings and that they do not duplicate other educational programs offered
    in the area. See also Educ. Code SS 61.051(j), 61.054.
    You finally ask whether your Board of Regents has authority to establish an
    East Texas State University System Administration.  The Education Code defines
    “1111
    niversity system” to mean
    the association of one or more public senior colleges or
    universities, medical or dental units, or other agencies of
    higher education under the policy direction of a single
    governing board.
    Section 61.003(g). Although the Coordinating Board has authority under section
    61.051(b) to define “university system, ” it apparently has not promulgated a
    different definition.   East Texas State is a public senior university.     Educ. Code
    S 61.003(3), (4). “Other agency of higher education” is defined to include any unit
    established to operate as a component part of a public senior college or university.
    Educ. Code, S 61.003(6). In our opinion, the Texarkana campus and the metroplex
    center constitute     agencies of higher education within this definition.          The
    association of the two campuses of East Texas State and its metroplex center under
    a single Board of Regents thus constitutes a university system for purposes of
    section 61.003(6). There is in our opinion legislative authority for the establishment
    of a system of administration    at East Texas State, which constitutes preexisting
    law for an appropriation to fund a system administration.      See Tex. Const. art. 3, §
    44; Austin National Bank v. Sheppard, 
    71 S.W.2d 242
    (Tex.1934). However, there is
    P.    4856
    .    -
    Honorable F. H. (Bub) McDowell     -        Page 4    (H-1211)
    no appropriation for an East Texas State System Administration.           The General
    Appropriation Act expressly funds the system administration      for the University of
    Texas System, the Texas A & M University System, the University System of South
    Texas, the University of Houston System, and the Texas State University System.
    Acts 1977, 65th Leg., ch. 872, at 3028, 3044, 3058, 3064, 3083. No funds are
    earmarked for an East Texas State University System Administration.         In view of
    the express appropriations for other systems, we believe that East Texas State
    must also have an express appropriation before it can use its funds for a system
    administration.  Since it has no funds for that purpose, it lacks present authority to
    pay salaries of system administrators        and other expenses incident to the
    establishment of a system administration.   See
    -    Educ. Code S 51.006.
    SUMMARY
    East Texas State University has no authority to buy a
    building for its commuter program center, either by pur-
    chase or lease-purchase.    The University may offer courses
    for resident credit in its commuter center provided that the
    Coordinating Board approves the course offerings and that
    they do not duplicate other educational programs in the
    area. The Regents of East Texas have authority to establish
    a system administration, but have no appropriated funds to
    finance it.
    _ Very truly yours,
    JOHN L. HILL
    Attorney General of Texas
    Opinion Committee
    p.    4857
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-1211

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1978

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017