Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1977 )


Menu:
  • ..   .
    TRERTTOISNEY     GENERAT,
    OF TJ-GXAS
    AUSTIN.     TIEXAS   78711
    The Honorable Gerald W. Schmidt          Opinion No. H-988
    County Attorney of Gillespie
    County                                 Re: Retroactive claim of
    Fredericksburg, Texas 78624              the agricultural use property
    tax exemption.
    Dear Mr. Schmidt:
    You have requested our opinion concerning the authority
    of a commissioners court to adjust the assessed value of land
    for 1975 upon the filing of an agricultural affidavit in
    1976 where the taxpayer failed to file the affidavit prior to
    the assessment for 1975.
    Article 8, section l-d(b) of the Texas Constitution pro-
    vides:
    For each assessment year the owner wishes
    to qualify his land under provisions of
    this Section as designated for agricultural
    use he shall file with the local tax assessor
    a sworn statement in writing describing the
    use to which the land is devoted.
    Articles 7211 and 7212, V.T.C.S., provide for the valua-
    tion of property. Once the valuation of property has been
    determined and same entered upon the roll, the Board of
    Eaualisation has no Dower to increase or reduce such valuation.
    Bass v. Aransas County Independent School District, 
    389 S.W.2d 165
    (Tex. Civ. App. -- Corpus Christi 1965, writ ref'd n.r.e.1;
    Chicago R.I.& G. Ry. Co. v. State, 
    241 S.W. 255
    (Tex. Civ. App.
    -- Texarkana 1922), aff'd, 
    263 S.W. 249
    (Tex. Comm'n App. 1924,
    jdgmt adopted); Clawson Lumber Co. v. Jones, 
    49 S.W. 909
    (Tex.
    Civ. App. 1899, no writ); Attorney General Opinion V-1517 (1952).
    We are unable to discern any language in article 8, section l-d
    which would alter this long established rule.
    Cayuga Independent School District, 539 S.W.2d
    m76), the court stated:
    p. 4107
    The Honorable Gerald W. Schmidt - page 2    (H-988)
    We hold that a landowner seeking the
    agricultural,use designation and assess-
    ment can qualify by discharging his bur-
    den of timely showing in a proper admin-
    istrative or judicial proceeding that
    his land is designated for agricultural
    use. . . .
    (Emphasis added). 
    Id. at 869.
    See Attorney General Opinion
    H-863 (1976). Whilearticle   7343h; V.T.C.S., purports to
    authorize such a revaluation, it has been declared unconsti-
    tutional. Bass v. Aransas County Independent School 
    District, supra
    , and Attorney General Opinions cited therein.
    Accordingly, in our opinion a commissioners court may
    not adjust the assessed value of land for a past year upon
    the basis of an agricultural use affidavit which was filed
    subsequent to the original assessment.
    S'U MMA     RY
    A commissioners court has no authority
    to adjust the assessed value of land for
    a past year upon the basis of an agri-
    cultural use affidavit which was filed
    subsequent to the original assessment.
    Very truly yours,
    (l&L/7&
    ,’ JOHN L. HILL
    //Attorney    General of Texas
    p. 4108
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-988

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1977

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017