Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1969 )


Menu:
  •                   EA         RNEU         GENERAL
    XAS
    June 18, 1969
    Honorable Preston Smith                       Opinion No. M-422
    Governor of Texas
    Austin, Texas                                 Re:   Validity of Senate
    Bill 416, Acts of the
    61st Legislature, Re-
    Dear Governor Smith:                                gular Session, 1969
    Your request for an opinion on the validity of Senate
    Bill 416, Acts of the 61st Legislature, Regular Session, 1969,
    providing for the creation of a Board of Regents for Stephen F.
    Austin State College, poses the following questions:
    "1.    Is Section 1 of the act so inconsistent
    as to invalidate the act in its entirety?
    "2 .   If not, is a six member or a nine member
    board created and how are the members to
    be appointed?"
    Section 1 of Senate Bill 416, Acts of the 61st Legis-
    lature, Regular Session, 1969, reads as follows:
    "Section 1. (a) The control and manage-
    ment of Stephen F. Austin State College is
    vested in a board of nine regents, appointed
    by the governor with the advice and consent
    of the Senate.
    "(b) Rxcept for the initial appointees,
    members of the board shall hold office for
    terms of six (6) years expiring on January 31
    - 2110-
    .
    Honorable Preston Smith, Page 2 (W-422)
    of odd-numbered years. In making the
    initial appointments, the governor shall
    designate two for terms expiring in 1971,
    two for terms expiring in 1973, and two
    for terms expiring in 1975. Any vacancy
    shall be filled by appointment for the
    unexpired portion of the term. Not more
    than two (2) members of said Board of
    Regents shall be appointed from or be a
    resident of any one (1) State Senatorial
    District, and no member of the said board
    may be appointed from or be a resident of
    the county in which the University is
    located."
    It is noted that subdivision (a) above quoted provides
    for a nine-member board while subdivision (b) provides for a six-
    member board. Neither the caption of Senate Bill 416 nor the
    emergency clause nor any other section of the Act indicates
    whether the Legislature intended to create a nine or six-member
    board. It is therefore impossible for this office to reconcile
    the conflict contained in Section 1.
    Accordingly, we believe your questions are answered by
    the principle of law announced in Southern Canal Comoanv vs. State
    Board of Water Rnqineers, 
    159 Tex. 227
    , 
    318 S.W.2d 619
    (19581,
    wherein the Supreme Court of Texas stated:
    *Courts are reluctant to strike down a
    legislative act because of conflicting
    or vague provisions. The general rule
    is that inconsistencies will be resolved,
    if possible, in order to give effect to
    the dominant legislative intent manifested
    by a statute. 39 Tex.Jur. 205-208, Stat-
    utes, i% 110,111. But when the provisions
    of a statute are so inharmonious and con-
    flictinq as to render it imoossible of
    -2111-
    .    -
    Honorable Preston Smith, page 3 (M-422)
    execution. the courts have no alternative
    but to declare it inoperative and void.
    Hill County v. Sheppard, 
    142 Tex. 358
    , 178
    S.W.Zd 261; Hamrick v. Simpler, 
    127 Tex. 428
    , 
    95 S.W.2d 357
    ; Walsh v. McConnell,
    Tex.Com.App., 
    273 S.W. 833
    : Dewrell v.
    Kearley, 
    250 Ala. 18
    , 32 So.Zd 812: 39 Tex.
    Jur. 43-44, Statutes, 3 21; 50 Am.Jur. 484,
    Statutes, 3 472; 82 C.J.S. Statutes 1368d,
    p.119.L' (Emphasis added.)
    You are therefore advised that it is our opinion the pro-
    visions of Section 1 are so inharmonious and conflicting as to
    render it impossible of construction and the provisions of Senate
    Bill 416, Acts of the 61st Legislature, Regular Session, 1969, are
    inoperative and void.
    SUMMARY
    The provisions of Senate Bill 416, Acts of the 61st
    Legislature, Regular Session, 1969, creating a Board of
    Regents for Stephen F. Austin State College provides for
    a nine-member board and a six-member board. Its provi-
    sions, therefore, are so inharmonious and conflicting as
    to render such provisions void. Southern Canal Company
    vs. State Board of Water Rnsineers, 
    159 Tex. 227
    , 
    318 S.W.2d 624
    .
    Prepared by John Reeves
    Assistant Attorney General
    -2112-
    Honorable Preston Smith, page 4 (M-422)
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Robert C. Crouch
    Houghton Brownlee
    John Grace
    Roger Tyler
    Roland Allen
    Hawthorne Phillips
    Executive Assistant
    - 2113-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-422

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1969

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017