Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1964 )


Menu:
  •        THEATTORNICYGENERAI.
    OIF %-EXAS
    August 24,         1964
    Honorable 3esae James                 Opinion No. C- 297
    State Treasurer
    Austin, Texas                         Re:   Where the special trust fund
    created by Section 9 of Article
    4.08, Texas Insurance Code,
    contains insufficient    funds to
    pay for publication    of notices
    required under Section 5 of
    such Article,   may the cost of
    such publication    be paid out
    of the general appropriation
    to the State Treasurer’s    office,
    and If not, may the expense of
    publication   be incurred and
    paid from the special trust
    fu’uiTas money accrues to such
    Dear Mr. James:
    You have requested     an opinion    of this   office   Involving
    the following   questions:
    Where the special trust fund created by Section 9 of
    Article  4.08, Texas Insurance Code, contains insufficient funds
    to pay for publication  of notices required under Section 5 of,
    such Article:
    “(1)   Whether the cost of such publications
    can be ~pald from regular appropriations  from the
    Qeneral Revenue Pund made to this office    for gen-
    eral operating expenses.
    ?(2)  If we are prohibited   from paying the
    expense of such publication    from the above referred
    to General Revenue Fund appropriations,    is there any
    prohibition   against Incurring the expenses of publica-
    tion as required by Section 5 and later making payment
    from the special trust fund provided for In Section 9
    of said Article    4.08, Texas Insurance Code.”
    -1418-
    Hon. Jesse Jamear page 2 (C-297)
    Texas Insurance   Code (Vernon’s      1948) Article     4.08,
    Section    5 reads In part:
    .The axpense8 of publication shall
    be cha$d      against the special trust fund pro-
    vided for    in Section 9.”
    Article   4.08, Section    9 reads   in part:
    .The remaining one-fourth    shall be
    admlni&ked     by him as a special   trust fund for
    the purposea of this Article,    and deposited in
    the manner provided by law for the deposit of
    said funds.    . . .”
    The ordinary meaning of the word “shall” is mandatory
    and equivalent   to “must. ” Also, when the intent clearlp      Indicates
    that the word “shall” as uaed In a statute Is Intended to be manda-
    tory, it is inconsistent    with any idea of discretion     and is manda-
    t~~orel14c;aren v. St       
    92 Tex. Crim. 449
    , 
    199 S.W. 811
    (1917);
    v             Hancoclc 
    1 S.W. 694
    , 700 (Tex.Clv.App.     1917); Jaynes
    306 S W 2d i      Tex.Clv.App.    1957)   No cases have Involved
    8 of Ariicle      8 or the intent of-the Lenlslature      within
    this Article.    Initiated  hereuMer    Is  a new and separate  admlnls-
    tlration of funds subject to escheat held by life insurance companlet
    The Auatln.Court of Civil Appeals in the case of Lawson
    v. Baker, 
    220 S.W. 260
    (Tex.Clv.App.    1920, error ref.) cona-
    a specla’l state revolving   fund and the intent of the Le lslature In
    administration   of that fund.   The Court saidsat page 26if
    t
    “It is a paramount rule of statutory     con-
    struction    that in case of doubt, the intention
    of the Legislature    is to be ascertained   If pos-
    sible.     . . .
    “The emergency clause of a statute Is often
    an Important ala In detemainlng the legislative
    purpose; 3d in,thls   case we think it peaullarly
    ao.   . . .
    The Emergenoy Clause,      $eotion   3 o? Article     4.08,   reads
    in part:
    “The fact that the pre8ent laws provld-ing
    toti the escheat OS abandoned fundo held by life
    .   insurance   companies and due and plyrble  under any
    life or endowment Insurance policy or annuity
    -1419,
    Hon. Jesse   James, page 3 (C-297)
    contract which has matured or terminated are
    indefinite, lnadequftte and confusing, creates
    an amergenoy . . .
    Article   4.08, Section 9 creates a special trust fpnd
    from specific     unclaimed finds of life insurance companies.           To
    provide expenses of publication          and administration   of the act is
    the specific     purpose of the special trust find of Section 9. The
    Emergency Clause clearly        states that the Legislature      intended to
    eliminate indefinite       and confusing laws applicable      to~llfe   in-
    surance companies.        Interpretation    of mandatory language in Section
    5 should resolve doubt or confusion as to the fund from which money
    originates    in Article    4.08 for expenses of publication.         The Legis-
    lature intended to eliminate confusion through mandatory deslgnatlo~
    In Section 5 of the Section 9 $pectal trust fund as the only fund
    to be charged with expenses of publication.             We are of the opinion
    that the cost of publication         may not be paid out of the general
    appropriation     to the State Treasurer’s      office.
    Your second question Is whether the expense of publica-
    tion may be Incurred and paid from the special trust fund as
    money accrues to such fund.     Section 6 of Article  VIII of the
    Constitution   of Texas provides that no money may be drawn from
    ;;;  treasury unless a specific   appropriation  has been made there-
    . Article   4.08, Section 9 reads in part:
    “Upon receipt  of any unclaimed funds from
    such life insurance companies by the State Treas-
    urer, he shall pay forthwith    three-fourths   of the
    amount thereof into the general funds of the state
    for the use of the state.    The remaining one-fourth
    shall be administered by him as a special trust fund
    for the purposes of this Article,     and deposited  in
    the m$nner provided by law for deposit of said funds.
    . . .
    Essential   elementa required in a valid appropriation
    were dlscueaed in Atkins v. State Highway Department, 
    201 S.W. 226
    (Tex.Clv.App.    IVIB).  Th C     t    Id   d      tingent amounts
    to be deposited to a specialefu~drinc%s,e~&hc~~gislature.         Ch.
    190, B 23 which read In part:
    “All funds coming Into the hands of the
    highway commission, derived from the registration
    fees herein before provided for, or from other
    sources,  as collected,   shall be deposited with the
    state treasurer    to the credit of a special fund
    - 14to-
    .
    Hon. Jesse    James, Pat50 4 (C-297)
    designated    ept).the ‘state hlghway fund’ and shall
    “,;,pz   @     ~, only ‘In the maper provided In the
    %.wposes   stated.
    The Courts held that this provlsl@n allocating      con-
    tingent   amounts to a speolal fund oonatltuted     a valid appro-
    priation   within the moaning ot Artlole    VIII, Section 6 of the
    Constitution    of Texas.  An appmrlation     Occurs when an act of
    the Legislature    sets apart,shd s~eolally   designates   the mone
    derived from a particular     sour00 OS revenue to a partlcu I-9ar
    ~~ct5~‘~d~~~~:~~~~~~*~~’                         ti??%la~%~nds
    &II life ins&&       oompanie~ whlohj’as  collected,    are deposited
    with the State Treaenmer to the credit of a special trust fund
    to administer the purposes of the Aot.    A valid appro r;;t;;z
    of money within the meaning of Article   VIII, Section Ii
    Constitution  of Texas wao made by the Legislature     in Article  4.08,
    Seotion 9 for the purpose8 stated in the Act.
    After the Legislature   has appropriated  money for a state
    agency to Its use and maintenance, that agency may Incur debts
    and pay thos!? debts a8 money accrues to the administering      fund.
    See our Opinion No. o-1544.    In the oaee of Ferguson v. Johnr@n,
    57 S.W.28 372 (Tex.Clv.App.   1933, error diem.),  contractual     power
    of a state agency to bZnd a apeolal f’und containing    lnsuffiolent
    funds was corisidered.  The Court said at pages 378 and 379:
    . .A11 general leglsl~tlve      ,approprlations
    for the support of the &ate government and its
    various departments and aotlvltles         are made for a
    future biennium, the revenues to meet which are
    prospective    and poese6s an element of uncertainty
    equally as great as that incident to those we are
    considering.      We know of no instance in which the
    accumulation of such revenues In the treasury is
    a prerequisite     to Incurring govdrllaent llablllty.
    The Legislature     Itself   creates such llablllty     in
    advance of covering treasury receipts         in cases of
    specific    appropriations,    and authorizes   creation
    of such llabllity      by Its oontraotlng    agencies.
    ‘The departmental constructlqn   evidenced by
    the uniform practice   of contracting  against .anticlRated
    revenues stands unchallenged    in the record.   . . .
    We are of the opinion      that the appropriation  by the
    Legislature     for funds collected      through esoheat procedures from
    -1421-
    Hon. Jesse   James, page 5 (C- a71
    life insurance companies allows expenses    of publication to be
    inqurred and paid from the special trust    fund a8 mopey accrues
    ,, to auc~ fund.
    SUMMARY
    Where the special trust fund created by
    Section 9 of Article   4.08, Texas Insurance Code,
    contains insufficient   funds to pay for publlca-
    tion of notices required under Section 5 of such
    Article,,  the coat of such publication  may not be
    paid qut of the general appropriation    to the State
    Treasurer’s   office, but the expense of publication
    may be Incurred and paid from the special trust
    fund a8 money accrues to such fund.
    Very truly    your8,
    WAGOONER CARR
    Attorney General
    By:
    Gordon Rouser
    Assistant
    (tH:mlrmkh
    APPROVEDI
    OPlyIOH COHNITTEE
    W. V. Qeppert , Chairman
    Pat Bailey
    Gordon Case
    R,Iou;gler
    EPROVRD FOR THE ATTORWRY
    IEWERAL
    : Stanton Stone
    -1422-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C-297

Judges: Waggoner Carr

Filed Date: 7/2/1964

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017