Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1964 )


Menu:
  •                      June 10, 1964
    Mr. Raymond W. Vowel1                Opinion Wo. c-265
    Executive Director
    Board for Texas State Hospitals      Re: Whether the appropriation
    and Special Schools                    to the Board for Texas
    Austin, Texas                            State Bospitals and Special
    Schools, contained in the
    General AppropriationBill
    can be used to purchase
    land for the stated pur-
    Dear Mr. Vowell:                         pose.
    You have requested an opinion on whether the appropriation
    to the Board for Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools, con-
    tained in the General AppropriationBill can be used to purchase
    land for the purpose of expanding the Lufkin State School and Its
    sewage treatment plant. In response to our request for additional
    informationyou have advised us that the Board intends to expend
    approximately$10,000 for the acquisition of necessary land to
    carry out the proposed expansion.
    Section 1, Article 3263d of Vernon's Civil Statutes
    states as follows:
    "Should the Board for Texas State Wospitals
    and Special Schools acquire from the United States
    of America the property and facilities located
    near Lufkln, Texas, and known as the Lufkin Air
    Force Base, said Board shall establish and maintain
    an additional school for the diagnosis, special
    training, education, supervision,treatment, care
    and control of mentally retarded persons of this
    state. After the establishmentof said school,
    it shall be known as the 'Lufkin State School.'"
    Said land has been acquired by the Board and the School
    has been established.
    Section 2, Article 3263d of Vernon's Civil Statutes
    states as follows:
    -1264-
    Mr. Raymond W. Vowell, page 2 (C-265)
    "Within the limits of appropriatedfunds
    the Board is further authorized to acquire by
    eminent domain, urchase or glft, additional
    land adjacent tobilities        so acquired from
    the United States Government for the purpose of
    enlarging said school." (Emphasisadded).
    An examinationof the clear and unambiguous
    -           wording
    t;e expresf
    g E%%tool."
    The current appropriationfor Lufkln State School as
    stated In House Bill No. 86, Acts 58th Legislature 1963, Regular
    Session, Chapter 525, Page 1412 Is as follows:
    "1. Expansion to include 800 Added Beds .....2.000.000'
    Said appropriationIs for the express purpose of expanding, or
    enlarging, the School to include additional beds. An express
    power Is necessarilyaccompaniedby implied powers. This was
    clearly explained by the Texas Supreme Court in Terre11 v. Sparks,
    
    104 Tex. 191
    , 
    135 S.W. 519
    , 521 (lgll), wherein the Court held:
    nWhenevera power is given by statute, every-
    thing necessary to make It effectual or requisite
    to attaln the end is implied. It is a well-estab-
    lished arinciole that statutes containinngrants
    of power are 'tobe construed so as to include the
    authority to do all things necessary to accomplish
    the object of the grant. The grant of an express
    power carries with It by necessary Implicationevery
    0
    th er                                 e execu on 0
    the power expressly,granted. Where the law commands
    anvthinn to be done. It authorizes the oerformance
    of-whatevermay be necessar for executing its
    commands." (Emphasisaddedv .
    Further, in this regard, attention is called to the case of Moon
    v. Alred, 
    277 S.W. 787
    , 788 (Tex.Civ.App.1925, error dism. Ej.),
    wherein the Court stated:
    "While no Texas case has been found on all
    fours, as to the exact state of facts, with the
    case at bar, in other jurisdictionsthe question
    has been directly decided. In Territory v. BELxter,
    
    16 Okla. 359
    , 
    83 P. 709
    , the Supreme Court of
    Oklahoma. in construinga statute identical in
    substance with ours, h&d that the power given a
    -1265-
    .   -
    m.      Raymond w. Vowell, page 3 (C-265)
    commissioners1court to issue bonds to build
    likewise implied power to issue such bonds
    to equip the same." (Emphasisadded).
    Therefore, the express powers concerning expansion,
    given to the Board by the aforesaid statute and appropriation,
    give the Board the implied power to use a
    propriated funds for the express purpose
    necessary for the expansion prescribed in the
    tion.
    SUMMARY
    Section 2, Article 3263d of Vernon's Civil
    Statutes gives the Board the express power to use
    appropriatedfunds for the purchase of addition%1
    land 'for the purpose of enlarging said School.
    The current appropriationfor said School provides
    $2,00$,000.00for expansion "to include 800 Added
    Beds. Under the well recognized doctrine that
    express powers carry by necessary implicationevery
    other power necessary and proper to the execution
    of the powers expressly granted, the Board is au-
    thorized to expend a portion of the aforesaid ap-
    propriated funds for the purchase of a site upon
    which the Board can carry out its authorized
    expansion.
    Yours very truly,
    WAGGONER CARR
    Attorney General
    RBJ:sj:mkh                              Roy-B. Johnson
    Assistant
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    John Reeves
    Cecil Rotsch
    Larry Merriman
    George Gray
    APPROVED FOR TRE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    BY: Stanton Stone
    -1266-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C-265

Judges: Waggoner Carr

Filed Date: 7/2/1964

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017