Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1948 )


Menu:
  •                           Y&m A~IQNEY     GENERAL
    0~ TEXAS
    AUSTIN.T&KAB
    PRXCXS     DANIEL                                                               FAOAN      DICWl‘SON
    .wwo-0-L                                                                           .,---
    December     22,   1948
    Hon. M. B. Morgan, Commissioner
    Bureau of Labor Statistics
    Austin, Texas                Opinion             No.    V-752.
    Re:     The authority    of the
    Chief Deputy Cosnmis-
    sioner,   Bureau of La-
    bor Statistics,    to ex-
    ecute instruments    to
    disburse   State funds
    instead   of the Coamis-
    sioner when the latter
    :to;bsent    from the Cap-
    .
    Dear Sir:
    You request    our   opinion     on the    following
    question:
    "In my absence from the Austin offices,
    is it possible,    within the law, for w Chief
    Deputy to sign his name in ny stead to in-
    struments  calling    for disbursement of State
    funds of this Department?"
    Our statute      places:the      Bureau of Labor Sta-
    tistics    "under the charge and control            of the Comais-
    sioner   of Labor Statistics"          (Art.    5145) and provides
    thathis     "office     shall be in the Capitol         Building."
    Art. 5144. Article         6814, V.. C. S., provides         for "the
    Commissioner      of Labor~Statistk+s          . . . a chief    deputy
    p,nvidL~d)       . .~ a deputies. 'I' Article       4355, V. C. S.,
    . "all     claims and accounts         against   the State
    shall   . . . provide      for the entering        thereon   . . . the
    . . . 1.     signature      of the'head      of the department or
    other Pierson, regponsible        ~for incurring      the expenditure."
    In the Employment and Labor Agency Law (V. C.
    S ., Art. 5221a+,     Se,c. 1. (g) ') the term "deputy"  is
    defined   *Ias any person who is duly authorized     by the
    Commissioner    to act in that capacity."     Tex. Jur. in
    Hon. M. B. Morgan,     page 2 (V-752)
    the article entitled     “Public   Officers,”    34 Tex.      Jur.
    605, par. 156, says:
    “The business    of a deputy is to per-
    form the duties      of his principal.       In the
    absence    of a statutory     provision    to the
    contrary,     he is generally     authorized    to do
    all such official      acts as may lawfully       be
    done by his principal,        except to appoint      a
    deputy . . . The duties        imposed by the stat-
    ute on an officer,      when performed,      are re-
    garded in law as performed         by him, whether
    actually     so performed   (by him) or by his
    authorized     deputy.    In other words, the of-
    ficial    acts of the deputy are the acts of
    the principal.”
    Waggoner    v. Urban,   
    177 S.W. 270
    ,    273   ststes:
    “A public  official     is not authorized.
    to delegate   his official     duties to another,
    other than to a deputy.”
    26 C. J.    S. 978 defines    a deputy      as:’
    “One appointed      as the substitute        of
    another,    and empowered to act for him in his
    name or on his behalf;         one who is appointed,
    designated,      or deputed to act for another;
    one who by .appointment        exercises     an office
    in another’s      right;   one who occupies       in
    right   of snother;      and for whom his superior
    will   regularly     answer; a clerk or similar
    person with all the powers of the principal.
    The position      of a ‘deputy,’      as the word im-
    plies,    is that of a subordinate,          and he has
    power to do every act which his principal
    might do, but a deputy may not make a deputy.
    The term is used in composition            with the
    names of various       executive    officers    to de-
    note assistants       empowered to act in their
    names, as deputy collector,           deputy. marshal,
    deputy sheriff.”
    In Bigham v. State,.148   S. W. .(2d) 835, 840,
    the Court of Criminal Appeals in holding      a deputy su-
    pervisor   of the Railroad  Commission to .be an officer
    indictable   as such for accepting   a bribe,  said:
    ,
    Hon. M. B. Morgan,       page 3 (V-752)'
    -That one:.is  called  a de~puty, carries
    with it the fact that he is an alter          ego for
    his superior,    being charged with all the du-
    ties as well as the responsibilities          of.his
    superior,    and empowered to perform the acts'
    and 'discharge    the duties  of such'superior,
    and to that extent     becoming the .superior        ofi
    ficer   himself  in his superior's    absence.        If
    the superior    be denominated~an    officer,      then.
    the deputy would also be such an officer."
    In Udited States v. Roc,kefellex,         '221 Fed..
    462, it was held that where Congres.ahaving             ,euthor-~
    ized the appointment      of deputy clerks      to the district      ~'
    court wi,thout specifically      defining,    or preecrdbing
    their  duties,   it mustbe    assumed that it was intended-:,,
    that the word "deputy"      should have ah ordinary         and usu-
    al meaning, as a person to whomthe duties              of a.-'clerk  _'
    are deputed, and the deputy clerk,          in the event that
    the clerk   is incapacitated,     absent,or     disabled,    and
    cannot perform the du.ties which the law imposes on him,.
    may act, and therefore      it did not affect,      the valiaityy
    of an indictment,   that the names~ were placed in the jury
    box from which grand jurors,,were        drawn by'the.de~puty       ~~
    clerk and not by'the ~clerk.
    46 C. J. Title      "Officers"    p.   1063 states:
    "When the law authorizes       an officer      to
    appoint a deputy without           any express    limita-
    tion upon.his     power, the duties       of the office
    :. A>,  may    be  performed   ,by.either,    and  a deputy may
    ‘exercise.any      of' the duties pertaining         to the
    office,    as the necessity       or convenience     of
    the publio may demahdtheir           use, . . .*'
    A great variety      of duties are imposed upon
    the Commissioner        of the Bureau of Labor Statistics.          He
    supervises     atid enforces     the Boxing and Wrestling     Law,
    the Boiler     Inspection    Law,,~the Health,     Safety and Mor-
    als Law, the Child Labor Law, the Semi-Monthly              Pay Day
    Law, the Employment.,aca~ LaborAgency            Law, the Spider
    Law concerning       cotton bales,      the 9-54 Hour Law for Wom-
    en,  and    many  others.     To  assist   and help the Comia-
    sioner    in the performances of his duties         the statutes
    authorize     the appointment       of deputies.    "The business
    and object     of a deputy is to perform the duties          of,his
    principal."       Rose v. Newman, 
    26 Tex. 131
    , 135, 80 Am;
    Rep. 646.
    Hon. b1. B. Morgan,     page 4 (V- 752)
    The statutes   do not set out the duties,        nor
    do they place any limitation       upon the duties,    of either
    the chief   deputy or deputies.       The Legislature    in .its
    wisdom has seen fit     to authorize     the appointment    of a
    chief  deputy and deputies. and does not specifically            de-
    fine or describe    their  duties.     It must therefore     be
    assumed that the Legislature       intended   that the word
    “chief  deputy” and “deputy” should have their ordinary
    and usual meaning..
    In view of the foregoing,        the Commissioner
    may in his absence from the Capitol          designate    the chief
    deputy to approve instruments       calling     for disburseirent
    of State funds in that department and should you desire
    to so designate     your chief   deputy,    then we suggest    ~that
    you so notify    the Comptroller    of Public Accounts       and
    the State Treasurer.      This,   in our opinion,      is ,not ab-
    solutely  e,ssential,   but it would be advisable.
    The Commissioner    of the Bureau of Labor
    Statistics      may designate   his chief   deputy to
    execute     instruments   to disburse   State funds
    :;o;is     stead when he is absent from the Cap-
    .
    Yours   very   truly,
    ATTORNEYGENERALOF: TEXAS
    Bv
    -1
    David Wuhtch
    DW:1h:wb: bh                                Assistant
    APPROVED:
    

Document Info

Docket Number: V-752

Judges: Price Daniel

Filed Date: 7/2/1948

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017