Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1944 )


Menu:
  •                  i          RNEY    GENERAL
    0~    TEXAS
    Honorable James W. Swarts
    County Attorney
    Culberson County
    Van Horn, Texas
    Opinion NO. O-6097
    Re: Taxation of undeveloped
    oil and gas leasehold
    &states, and related
    questions.
    Dear Sir:
    We have received your recent letter requesting
    our opinion relative to the above captioned subject matter,
    Said letter is self explanatory and reads as follows:
    “I woul’dlike your opinion on the following
    propositions.
    “This county has a considerable land
    under lease for oil and gss and other mineral.
    “Some of this presumptlve 011 gas and
    mineral has been sold outrlght or at least In
    part.
    “1. Is the oil and gas lease, undeveloped,
    subject to taxation? If 80 at what valuation?
    “2. Is ,the mineral, 011 and gas which
    has been purohased outright, subject to taxation
    and if so at what value?
    “It would seem that a straight oil, gas or
    mlneral lease might not be considered property and
    subject to taxation while an out-right purchase
    of the mineral would be a title in realestate. The
    former being only a right to prospect.
    “3.   If either or both classes are subject
    Hon. James W. Swarts, Page 2 (No.O-6097)
    to taxation, then might the state sel,lthe same
    for delinquent taxes under the law providing for
    sale of land for delinquent taxes?
    "This is a matter which might ln-
    volve the collection of considerable money for
    county and state not only here but in other
    counties.
    "I would appreciate your opinion in
    this matter and citation of any authorities bear-
    ing on the question."
    The following two Articles pertain to the ques-
    tions Involved herein. Article 7145, V.A.C.S.:
    "All property, real, personal or mixed,
    except such as may be hereinafter expressly exempt,
    Is subject to taxation, and the same shall be
    rendered and listed as herein prescribed."
    Article 7146, V.A.C.S.:
    "Real property, for the purpose of
    taxation, shall be construed to Include the
    land itself, whether laid out in town lots or
    otherwise, and all buildings, structures and
    Improvements, or other fixtures of whatsoever kind
    thereon, and all rights and privileges belonging
    or in any wise appertaining thereto, and all
    mines, minerals, quarries and fossils in and under
    the same."
    It is now firmly established in Texas that oil
    and gas leases are realty and subject to taxation as such. See
    Texas Company v. Dougherty, 
    176 S.W. 717
    ~ Stephens County v.
    Mid-Kansas Oi1 and Gas Company, 
    254 S.W. 290
    ; State v. Down-
    man 
    134 S.W. 787
    ; Phllllp~s Petroleum Co. v. Townsend, 63 Fed.
    (2dj 293; Prince Bros. Drilling Co. v. Fuhrman Petroleum Corp.
    150,S.W. (2d) 314.
    The above cases hold that no distinction can be
    made as to the form of the lease and that an interest in land is
    created, whether the lessor granted, bargained, sold, or con-
    veyed the oil and gas to the lessee, or if the lessor let and
    leased the premises with the authority to operate for and
    Hon. James W. Swarts, Page 3 (No-O-6097)
    procure oil and gas. It follows therefore that since an oil
    and gas lease Is effective as conferring upon the lessee an
    interest in the land, the value thereof Is assessable against
    him for taxation. However, until there has been a severance
    of the mineral estate from the remainder of the land, the tax
    iB aBBeSSable against the owner of the land, as the rendition
    of the land carries with it the full value of the land.
    It is also settled beyond controversy that a mineral
    interest in land, as well as the lessor's estate or Interest,
    generally referred to as royalty, Is taxable as real estate.
    See Sheffield v. Hogg, 77 S.W. (2d) 1021.
    Mineral properties, whether same be a leasehold estate,
    royalty Interest, or a mineral estate are to be valued at such
    price as they would bring at a fair, voluntary sale for cash. The
    value defined in the constitntlon and statutes is the reasonable
    cash market value. Such profierty,when rendered, shall be valued
    as of January 1st the same as other real property.
    It follows, as a matter of course, that inasmuch as
    such mineral interests are in fact realty, that the State could
    bring a foreclosure suit for delinquent taxes thereon and sell
    the same as provided by our statutes in reference to real estate.
    Trusting that the above fully answers your questions,
    we are
    Yours very truly
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    Bys/ W. V. Geppert
    W. V. Geppert;
    Assistant
    APPROVED Jul 13, 1944
    W.P. Blackburn
    Acting Attorney General of Texas
    Approved Opinion Committee by BWB, Chairman
    WVG:fo"bt
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-6097

Judges: Grover Sellers

Filed Date: 7/2/1944

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017