Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    GREG        ABBOTT
    December      12,2003
    The Honorable Oliver S. Kitzman                              Opinion No. GA-O 129
    Waller County Criminal District Attorney
    836 Austin Street, Suite 103                                 Re: Whether the Waller County Commissioners
    Hempstead, Texas 77445                                       Court must provide notice and hold a hearing
    under section 25 1.152 of the Transportation Code
    before authorizing the installation of stop signs on
    a county road (RQ-0070-GA)
    Dear Mr. Kitzman:
    You ask whether the Waller County Commissioners Court must provide notice and hold a
    hearing under section 25 1.152 of the Transportation Code before authorizing the installation of stop
    signs on a county road.’
    Title 7, subtitle C of the Transportation Code, the “Rules of the Road,” applies uniformly
    throughout the state, and a local authority, such as a county, may regulate traffic only in a manner
    that does not conflict with it. See TEX. TRANSP.CODE ANN. 8 542.201 (Vernon 1999); see also 
    id. 0 541.002(3)
    (defining “local authority” to include a county or municipality). Subtitle C charges the
    Texas Department of Transportation with, among other things, adopting a manual for a uniform
    system of traffic-control devices, including stop signs,* and placing and maintaining traffic-control
    devices on state highways. 
    Id. 85 544.001-.002(a).
          A local authority may place and maintain a
    traffic-control device on a highway under its jurisdiction to implement subtitle C or a local traffic
    ordinance. 
    Id. 8 544.002(b);
    see also 
    id. 8 541.302(5)
    (defining “[hlighway or street” to mean “the
    width between the boundary lines of a publicly maintained way any part of which is open to the
    public for vehicular travel”).3 The traffic-control device must conform to the Department of
    Transportation’s manual. See 
    id. 5 544.002(b).
    ‘Letter from Debra Merge& Assistant Criminal District Attorney,        Waller County, to Office of the Attorney
    General, at 2 (received May 28, 2003) [hereinafter Request Letter].
    *See TEX. TRANSP. CODEANN. 9 541.304( 1) (Vernon 1999) (defming “[olfficial traffic-control device” to mean
    “a sign, signal, marking, or device that is: (A) consistent with this subtitle; (B) placed or erected by a public body or
    officer having jurisdiction; and (C) used to regulate, warn, or guide traffic”).
    3See aZso 
    id. 5 542.203(a)
    (“A local authority may not erect or maintain a traffic-control device to direct the
    traffic on a state highway, including a farm-to-market or ranch-to-market road, to stop or yield before entering or crossing
    an intersecting highway unless permitted by agreement between the local authority and the Texas Department of
    Transportation under Section 221.002.“).
    The Honorable   Oliver S. Kitzman    - Page 2         (GA-0129)
    Chapter 25 1, subchapter E of the Transportation Code authorizes a commissioners court to
    regulate traffic on county roads. See 
    id. 8 25
    1.15 1 (a commissioners court “may regulate traffic on
    a county road or on real property owned by the county that is under the jurisdiction of the
    commissioners court”). Section 25 1.152 requires a commissioners court to provide notice and hold
    a public hearing before issuing a traffic regulation:
    (a) Except as provided by Section 25 1.159, before the
    commissioners   court may issue a trafjc regulation under this
    subchapter, the commissioners court must hold a public hearing on
    the proposed regulation.
    (b) The commissioners     court shall publish notice of the
    hearing in a newspaper of general circulation in the county. The
    notice must be published not later than the seventh or earlier than the
    30th day before the date of the hearing.
    
    Id. 8 251.152
    (emphasis added).
    In connection with a request from the Waller County Road and Bridge Department for
    authorization to install stop signs at either end of a county road, you ask whether the Waller County
    Commissioners Court is required by section 251.152 “to place a notice in the newspaper and hold
    a public hearing before approving the placement of stop signs on a county road.” Request Letter,
    supra note I, at 2. You inform us that section 25 1.159, which applies only to a county with a
    population of more than 200,000, does not apply to Waller County. See 
    id. at 3;
    see also TEX.
    TRANSP.CODE ANN. 8 25 1.159 (Vernon Supp. 2004) (p ermitting commissioners court to provide
    a traffic-regulation notice by posting a sign in lieu of publication and requiring commissioners court
    to hold a public hearing on a proposed traffic regulation only if requested by a resident).
    Your query requires us to determine whether a commissioners court order authorizing the
    installation of stop signs on a county road is “a traffic regulation” under section 25 1.152. Chapter
    25 1, subchapter E does not define the term “traffic regulation,” and we have not located any judicial
    or attorney general opinion addressing section 25 1.152’s scope. Nor is the term “traffic regulation”
    defined in any other Texas statute. According to its common meaning, however, a “traffic
    regulation” is a broad term that refers to “a prescribed rule of conduct for traffic; a rule intended to
    promote the orderly and safe flow of traffic.” BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 1502 (7th ed. 1999)
    (defining “traffic regulation”); TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. 0 3 11 .Ol 1(a) (Vernon 1998) (words and
    phrases must be construed according to common usage), 3 11 .Ol l(b) (words and phrases that have
    acquired a technical or particular meaning, whether by legislative definition or otherwise, must be
    construed accordingly).
    Under the statewide “Rules of the Road,” a stop sign is a “traffic-control device” that governs
    drivers’ conduct. See, e.g., TEX. TRANSP.CODEANN. 83 544.01 O(a) (Vernon 1999) (“the operator
    of a vehicle or streetcar approaching an intersection with a stop sign shall stop as provided by
    Subsection (c)“), 544.01 O(c) (stop requirements),       545.15 1(a) (“[aln operator approaching an
    intersection . . . shall stop, yield, and grant immediate use of the intersection in obedience to an
    The Honorable    Oliver S. Kitzman    - Page 3          (GA-0129)
    official traffic-control device, including a stop sign or yield right-of-way sign”), 545.153(b) (“an
    operator approaching an intersection on a roadway controlled by a stop sign, after stopping as
    required by Section 544.010, shall yield the right-of-way to a vehicle that has entered the intersection
    from another”). A commissioners court order to install a stop sign at a particular location thus
    imposes a prescribed rule of conduct for traffic at that location. See 
    id. 8 544.002(b)
    (“To implement
    this subtitle or a local traffic ordinance, a local authority may place and maintain a traffic-control
    device on a highway under the authority’s jurisdiction.“) (emphasis added); see also Lorig v. City
    of MisSion, 
    629 S.W.2d 699
    , 700 (Tex. 1982) (“A stop sign is intended to regulate traffic for the
    safety of the public generally.“).     Accordingly, we conclude that a commissioners        court order
    authorizing the installation of stop signs on a county road is a “traffic regulation” within section
    25 1.152’s plain meaning.
    In addition, section 25 1.155 of the Transportation Code, which specifically addresses a
    commissioners court’s authority to install stop signs, indicates that a commissioners court order
    authorizing the installation of traffic-control devices, including stop signs, is a traffic regulation.
    Specifically, section 25 1.155(a) authorizes a cornmissioners court to “adopt regulations establishing
    a system of traffic control devices in restricted traffic zones on property described by Section
    251.151.” TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. 4 25 1.155(a) (Vernon 1999) (emphasis added); see also 
    id. 8 25
    1.15 1 (a commissioners court “may regulate traffic on a county road or on realproperty owned
    by the county that is under the jurisdiction of the commissioners court”) (emphasis added). Under
    section 25 1.155(c), a commissioners court may authorize the installation of certain traffic-control
    devices, including stop signs, by order: “The commissioners court by order entered on its minutes
    may install and maintain on property to which this section applies any traffic signal light, stop sign,
    or no-parking sign that the court considers necessary for public safety.” 
    Id. 8 25
    1.155(c) (emphasis
    added). A system of traffic-control devices adopted under section 25 1.155 “must conform to the
    manual and specifications of the Texas Department of Transportation.” 
    Id. $25 1.155(b).
    You contend, however, that section 25 1.155 does not apply to Waller County’s installation
    of stop signs because that statute deals only with “restricted traffic zones” and “Waller County has
    not established restricted traffic zones.” Request Letter, supra note 1, at 3. You suggest that a
    restricted traffic zone is an area with some special legal status and that section 25 1.155 does not
    apply unless the commissioners        court acts to install a traffic-control device in such an area.
    Although both sections 25 1.155 and 25 1.156 use the phrase “restricted traffic zone,” TEX. TRANSP.
    CODE ANN. 8 0 25 1.155(a), 25 1.156(a) (“The commissioners court of a county by order may have
    signs installed that prohibit or restrict the stopping, standing, or parking of a vehicle in a restricted
    traffic zone on property described by Section 251.151 . . . .“) (Vernon 1999 & Supp. 2004),
    subchapter E does not establish special rules or procedures for establishing restricted traffic zones.
    Subchapter E does not define the phrase nor is it used or defined by any other Texas law. The
    meaning of the phrase “restricted traffic zone” in sections 251 .155 and 215.156 is not clear, but
    given that state law does not afford a restricted traffic zone any special status, it appears that the
    phrase simply refers to an area in which the county regulates traffic.
    This interpretation of a restricted traffic zone as an area in which the county regulates traffic
    is supported by these provisions’ evolution over the last half century. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.
    0 3 11.023 (Vernon 1998) (in construing statutes, courts may consider, among other things, the
    The Honorable Oliver S. Kitzman       - Page 4         (GA-0129)
    circumstances under which a statute was enacted and the legislative history); see also Fleming Foods
    of Texas, Inc. v. Rylander, 
    6 S.W.3d 278
    , 284 (Tex. 1999) (“specific, unambiguous             [codified]
    statutes are the current law and should not be construed by a court to mean something other than the
    plain words say”). In 1947, this office concluded that a commissioners court lacked authority to
    regulate traffic speeds and to install traffic-control devices. See Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. V-429
    (1947). Thereafter, the legislature enacted several statutes authorizing counties to alter speed limits
    established by the State Highway Commission. See generally 
    id. V-1478 (1952).
    The legislature
    enacted the statutory predecessor to chapter 25 1, subchapter E of the Transportation Code, former
    article 6701 g of the Revised Civil Statutes, in 195 1. Section 1 authorized certain more populous
    counties “to create and establish restricted traffic zones” in the county. Act of April 18, 195 1,52d
    Leg., R.S., ch. 302, 5 1, 1951 Tex. Gen. Laws 483, 483 (codified as former article 6701g, 8 1).
    Section 3 authorized those counties to “adopt rules and regulations consistent with this Act for the
    establishment of a system of traffic control devices within restricted traffic zones.” 
    Id. 8 3
    at 483-84
    (codified as former article 6701g, 8 3). Xn 1971, the legislature amended article 6701g, section 1 to
    authorize certain counties to “regulate and restrict traffic on county roads,” deleting the phrase
    “restricted traffic zone” from section 1. See Act of May 19,1971,62d Leg., R.S., ch. 3 18,s 1,197l
    Tex. Gen. Laws 1260,126O. This new language appears to have broadened a commissioners court’s
    authority beyond regulating speeds to regulating traffic generally, while embracing counties’ existing
    authority to control traffic in restricted traffic zones. The same legislation added section l(b) to
    article 6701 g, requiring a commissioners court to “hold a public hearing before issuing any traffic
    regulation pursuant to this Act.” 
    Id. In 1983,
    the legislature repealed article 670 1g and adopted article 6702- 1 of the Revised Civil
    Statutes, the County Road and Bridge Act, which authorized commissioners courts in all counties
    to “regulate and restrict traffic on county roads” in section 2.30 1(a)( 1) and required a commissioners
    court to hold a hearing before issuing any traffic regulation in section 2.301 (a)(2). See Act of May
    20, 1983, 68th Leg., R.S., ch. 288, 88 l-2 (repealing article 67Olg), 1983 Tex. Gen. Laws 1431,
    1452,1526. The legislature codified the County Road and Bridge Act in the Transportation Code
    in 1995. See Act of May 1,1995,74th Leg., R.S., ch. 165, $3 1,24 (repealing article 6702-l), 1995
    Tex. Gen. Laws 1025, 1159-l 16 1, 1871. The codification omits the word “restrict” in section
    25 1.15 1 “because ‘restrict’ is included within the meaning of regulate.” TEX. TRANSP.CODE ANN.
    $ 25 1.15 1 revisor’s note (Vernon 1999).
    Subchapter E’s predecessors indicate that the phrase “restricted traffic zone” in sections
    25 1.155 and 25 1.156 is a vestige from former law and that the phrase refers to an area in which a
    county regulates traffic. Thus, section 25 1.155 applies whenever a commissioners court orders the
    installation of stop signs or other traffic-control devices.        Significantly, that statute’s express
    language is consistent with our conclusion that a commissioners court order to install stop signs
    constitutes a traffic regulation and is therefore subject to section 25 1.152’s procedural requirements.
    See 
    id. 0 251.155(a)
    (commissioners court may “adopt regulations establishing a system of traffic
    control devices in restricted traffic zones on property described by Section 25 1.15 1”) (emphasis
    added).
    The Honorable Oliver S. Kitzman     - Page 5         (GA-0129)
    SUMMARY
    Section 251.152 of the Transportation         Code requires a
    commissioners court to provide notice and hold a hearing before
    issuing a traffic regulation.    An order to install stop signs on a
    county road constitutes a traffic regulation.      The Waller County
    Commissioners Court must provide notice and hold a hearing under
    section 25 1.152 before authorizing the installation of stop signs on a
    county road. In addition, section 25 1.155 of the Transportation Code
    applies whenever a commissioners court orders the installation of
    stop signs or other traffic-control devices to regulate traffic. Stop
    signs installed by a county must conform with the Texas Department
    of Transportation’s manual for a uniform system of traffic-control
    devices. See TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. §§ 251.155(b), 544.001-
    .002(b) (V emon 1999).
    Very truly yours,
    BARRY R. MCBEE
    First Assistant Attorney General
    DON R. WILLETT
    Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
    NANCY S. FULLER
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    Mary R. Crouter
    Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: GA-129

Judges: Greg Abbott

Filed Date: 7/2/2003

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017