Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •   Y OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL . STATE OF TEXAS
    JOHN      CORNYN
    October 3 1,2002
    Mr. William M. Jeter III, Chairman                             Opinion No. JC-0570
    Office of Rural Community Affairs
    P.O. Box 12877                                                Re: Whether the Rural Foundation created by the
    Austin, Texas 7871 I-2877                                     Seventy-seventh Texas Legislature in chapter 110
    of the Health and Safety Code may finance rural
    programs that are not health programs
    (RQ-0552-JC)
    Dear Mr. Jeter:
    You have requested our opinion as to whether the Rural Foundation may finance programs
    other than rural health programs. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that-it may not do so.
    The Seventy-seventh Texas Legislature enacted House Bill 7, which amended chapter 487
    of the Government Code to create the Office of Rural Community Affairs. See Act of May 23,200 1,
    77th Leg., R.S., ch. 1424, 2001 Tex. Gen. Laws 5080. House Bill 7 requires “the governor, the
    lieutenant governor, and the speaker of the house of representatives,” not later than November 1,
    2001, to “appoint the initial members of the executive committee of the Office of Rural Connnunity
    Affairs.” See 
    id. 8 12(a),
    2001 Tex. Gen. Laws, at 5096. Section 13 of that bill provided that “[o]n
    the date by which a majority of the members of the executive committee of the Office of Rural
    Community Affairs have taken office, the Center for Rural Health Initiatives is abolished and all
    powers, duties, obligations, rights, contracts, leases, records, property, and unspent and unobligated
    appropriations and other funds of the Center for Rural Health Initiatives are transferred to the Office
    of Rural Community Affairs.” 
    Id. 9 13,200l
    Tex. Gen. Laws, at 5096-97. Thus, the Office of Rural
    Community Affairs is the successor agency to the Center for Rural Health Initiatives.
    The Seventy-seventh     Texas Legislature also enacted Senate Bill 115, which added
    chapter 110 to the Health and Safety Code to require the Center for Rural Health Initiatives,
    now the Office of Rural Community Affairs, to “establish the Rural Foundation as a nonprofit
    corporation that complies with the Texas Non-Profit Corporation Act.” TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY
    CODE ANN. 9 110.001(a) (Vernon Supp. 2002), added by Act of May 26, 2001, 77th Leg., R.S.,
    ch. 122 1, 5 1,200l Tex. Gen. Laws 2792. The Rural Foundation is directed to “raise money from
    foundations, governmental entities, and other sources to finance health programs in the rural areas
    of the state,” and is granted the “powers that are necessary and convenient to carry out its duties.“’
    ‘The Rural Foundation is also instructed to “develop and implement policies and procedures that clearly separate
    the responsibilities and activities of the foundation from the Center for Rural Health Initiatives,” now the Office of Rural
    (continued...)
    Mr. William M. Jeter III - Page 2                    (JC-0570)
    TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. 4 110.002(a) (Vernon Supp. 2002).                  These are the sole
    statutorily-mandated  duties of the Rural Foundation. It has been suggested “the Legislature intended
    that the Rural Foundation’s duties not be limited to only financing health programs, but to finance
    other programs in rural areas of Texas as we11.“2
    As the Texas Supreme Court said in Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc. :
    [I]t is cardinal law in Texas that a court construes a statute, “first, by
    looking to the plain and common meaning of the statute’s words.” If
    the meaning of the statutory language is unambiguous, we adopt, with
    few exceptions, the interpretation supported by the plain meaning of
    the provision’s words and terms. Further, if a statute is unambiguous,
    rules of construction or other extrinsic aids cannot be used to create
    ambiguity.
    Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Sys., Inc., 
    996 S.W.2d 864
    , 865-66 (Tex. 1999) (citation
    omitted). See also Tex. Dep ‘t of Transp. v. Garza, 
    70 S.W.3d 802
    , 806 (Tex. 2002); In re Am.
    Homestar oflancaster, Inc., 50 S.W.3d 480,486-87 (Tex. 2001); Am. Home Prods. Corp. v. Clark,
    38 S.W.3d 92,95-6 (Tex. 2000).
    In our opinion, there can be no doubt about the legislative intent regarding the duties of the
    Rural Foundation.      The purpose of the Rural Foundation is to raise money “to finance health
    programs. ,, TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. 5 110.002(a) (Vernon Supp. 2002) (emphasis
    added). “Health programs” is a specific term. If a “program” is outside the province of “health
    programs, ” it is not the kind of program that the Rural Foundation may finance. Of course, it is a
    question of fact as to whether any particular program is a “health program.”
    Even though the statute is clear on its face, we note that our conclusion is also supported by
    legislative history. The bill analysis for the House committee report on Senate Bill 115 states:
    In its Interim Report to the 77th Legislature, the House Select
    Committee on Rural Development found a substantial gap between
    urban and rural health care, with rural areas having fewer professional
    health care providers and hospitals.      According to the Center for
    Rural Health Initiatives (center), more than half of Texas’ rural
    counties (10 1 out of 196) are considered health professional shortage
    areas. The center is the primary state resource in planning,
    coordinating, and advocating statewide efforts to ensure continued
    access to rural health care services.       There are many national,
    ‘(...continued)
    Community Affairs. TEX. HEALTH & SAFETYCODE AN-N.$ 110.002(c)(Vernon Supp. 2002).
    *Letter from J. Randel (Jerry) Hill, General Counsel, Office of Rural Community   Affairs, to HonorableJohn
    Comyn, Texas Attorney General, at 1 (May 15,2002) (on file with Opinion Committee).
    Mr. William M. Jeter III - Page 3                   (JC-0570)
    regional, and in-state foundations that award grants to nonprofit
    organizations for a variety of programs, but do not award grants to
    governmental entities. A nonprofitfoundation    established under the
    umbrella of the center could help bring additional dollars to Texas
    to support rural health programs. Senate Bill 11.5 requires the center
    to establish the Rural Health Foundation3 as a nonprofit organization
    to raise money to finance health programs in rural areas.
    HOUSECOMM. ONPUBLICHEALTH,BILL ANALYSIS,Tex. S.B. 115’77th Leg., R.S. (2001) (emphasis
    added). We conclude therefore that the Rural Foundation is not authorized to finance programs other
    than rural health programs.
    3“Rural Health Foundation”   was changed to “Rural Foundation”   by subsequent   amendment.
    Mr. William M. Jeter III - Page 4            (JC-0570)
    SUMMARY
    The Rural Foundation, a nonprofit corporation created by the
    Seventy-seventh   Texas Legislature, is not authorized to finance
    programs other than rural health programs.
    Attorney General of Texas
    HOWARD G. BALDWIN, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    NANCY FULLER
    Deputy Attorney General - General Counsel
    SUSAN DENMON GUSKY
    Chair, Opinion Comrnittee
    Rick Gilpin
    Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JC-570

Judges: John Cornyn

Filed Date: 7/2/2002

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017