Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1970 )


Menu:
  •                     December 29, 1970
    Honorable Andy Shuval          Opinion No. M-763
    County Attorney
    Deaf Smith County Courthouse   Re:   Questions relating to
    Hereford, Texas 79045                authority of county of-
    ficers over juveniles.
    Dear Mr. Shuval:
    Your recent letter requesting the opinion of this
    office concerning the referenced matter poses the following
    questions:
    11
    1. Can the County Commissioners hire an
    individual as a deputy sheriff and charge him with
    investigating and handling juveniles in the same
    manner as a deputy might be charged with investi-
    gating and handling hot check cases.   It is under-
    stood that the deputy in question would report
    the findings of his investigation to the County
    Attorney for determination as to whether a formal
    complaint needs to be filed as provided in Article
    2338-1, V.A.T.S.
    "2 . In connection with the above question,
    can the County Judge utilize this deputy to make
    investigations for him and aid the Juvenile Court
    in other matters as the Judge may request.
    "3 . Can a Juvenile Judge commit a juvenile
    to jail in the manner shown by the copy of the
    attached commitment."
    The Order of Commitment attached to your letter was entered by
    the Judge of the Juvenile Court of Deaf Smith County, and it
    orders the commitment of a 16-year old male child, adjudged a
    delinquent, to the Deaf Smith County Jail "for a period of 90
    days, subject to the Court's review."
    Firstly, under the provisions of Article 3902, Vernon's
    Civil Statutes, a commissioners court does not have authority to
    appoint a deputy sheriff. However, the sheriff makes application
    -3726-
    .   .
    Hon. Andy Shuval, page 2   (M-763)
    to the commissioners court for appointment of such deputy, and
    the commissioners court, within its discretion, authorizes the
    appointment of such deputy and sets his salary within the minimums
    and maximums authorized by law. The commissioners court, or any
    member thereof, is prohibited from attempting to influence the
    appointment of any person as a deputy and such appointment is the
    exclusive function of the sheriff.
    The sheriff may authorize the deputy so appointed to
    investigate and handle juvenile matters and to report the find-
    ings of his investigations to the County Attorney in accordance
    with Article 2338-l(7), Vernon's Civil Statutes, as hereinbelow
    set forth.
    In our view, the legal issue presented for resolution
    by the substance of your first two questions is as follows:
    Does a deputy sheriff have the ex officio authority to perform
    the functions of a juvenile officer?
    The powers of a juvenile officer are set forth in
    Article 5142, which provides, in part, as follows:
    "Such (juvenile) officers shall have authority
    and it shall be their duty to make investigations of
    all cases referred to them as such by such (county
    juvenile) Board; to be present in court and to repre-
    sent the interest of the juvenile when the case is
    heard, and to furnish to the court and such Board
    any information and assistance as such Board may
    require, and to take charge of any child before and
    after the trial and to perform such other services
    for the child as may be required by the court or said
    Board, and such juvenile officers shall be vested
    with all the power and authority of police officers
    or sheriffs incident to their offices."
    We believe the foregoing Article evinces the intention
    of the Legislature to place primary responsibility for handling
    cases involving juvenile delinquents on individuals designated as
    juvenile officers.
    However, Article 2338-l(7), Vernon's Civil Statutes,
    provides that:
    "Any person may, and any peace officer shall,
    give to the Judge, County Attorney, or to the Pro-
    bation Officer of the county, information in his
    -3727-
    .
    Hon. Andy Shuval, page 3    (M-763)
    possession that a child is within the provisions of
    this Act. Thereupon the Judge, the County Attorney
    or the Probation Officer shall make or have made,
    preliminary inquiry to determine whether the interests
    of the public or of the child require that further
    action be taken.   If either the Judge or the County
    Attorney shall determine that formal jurisdiction
    should be acquired, the County Attorney shall prepare
    and file in the court, or any attorney may prepare
    and file in the court, a petition alleging briefly
    the facts which bring said child within the pro-
    visions of this Act, and stating:    (1) the name, age
    and residence of the child; the names and residences,
    (2) of his parents, (3) of his legal guardian, if
    there be one; (4) of the person or persons having
    custody or control of the child; and (5) of the
    nearest known relative, if no parent or guardian
    can be found. If any of the facts herein required
    are not known by the petitioner, the petition shall
    so state. The proceedings shall be styled 'In the
    matter of                    a delinquent child."'
    @mph asis added.)
    A deputy sheriff is county peace officer, and is, therefore,
    one of the persons and officers who may act under this Article.
    With the exception of the duties imposed upon peace officers by
    this Article, we are unable to find any further authorization for
    the performance by a deputy sheriff of the duties of a county
    juvenile officer.
    We are of the opinion that the following statement
    of the law is applicable to your question:
    "Public officers . . . possess only such
    powers as are expressly conferred on them by law
    or are necessarily implied from the powers so
    conferred.  They cannot legally perform acts not
    authorized by existing law." 47 Tex.Jur.2d 139-40,
    Public Officers, Sec. 106.
    In view of the foregoing, we hold that a deputy sheriff
    has no ex officio authority to perform the duties of a county
    juvenile officer, with the exception of those duties set forth in
    Article 
    2338-l(7), supra
    . However, this opinion does not restrict
    the duties or functions of any peace officer relative to any
    offenses committed by juveniles.
    -3728-
    Hon. Andy Shuval, page 4   (M-763)
    Your third question, and the copy of the commitment
    submitted to us in connection therewith, involves the legality
    of a juvenile court judge's committing a juvenile to a county
    jail.
    Article 2338-1(13)(c) provides as follows:
    "If the (juvenile court) judge or jury finds
    that the child is delinquent, or otherwise within
    the provisions of this Act, the court may by order
    duly entered proceed as follows:
    "(1) place the child on probation or under
    supervision in his own home or in the custody of a
    relative or other fit person, upon such terms as the
    court shall determine;
    "(2) commit the child to a suitable public in-
    stitution or agency or to a suitable private insti-
    tution or agency authorized to care for children;
    or place the child in a suitable family home or
    parental home for an indeterminate period of time,
    not extending beyond the time the child shall reach
    the age of twenty-one years;
    "(3) make such further disposition as the court
    may deem to be for the best interest of the child,
    except as herein otherwise provided."   (Emphasis
    added.)
    Article 2335X-1(17) provides:
    "No female person over the age of ten (10)
    years ?L?idunder the age of eighteen (18) years, or
    erson over the age of ten (10) years and
    %:hf              seventeen (17) years, shall be placed
    or committed to any compartment of any jail or lockup
    in which persons over juvenile age are incarcerated
    or detained; but shall be placed in a room or ward
    separate and apart from that occupied by adults . . .
    The proper authorities of all counties shall provide
    (a) suitable place of detention for such juveniles
    separate and apart from any jail or lockup in which
    adults are confined.   Said detention place may be
    in the same building housing adults, or in a
    building separate and apart from that where adults
    are confined."   (Emphasis added.)
    -3729-
    .       .
    Hon. Andy Shuval, page 5      (M-763)
    Article 5143c(l2), Vernon’s Civil Statutes, directs
    that:
    “When any child is adjudged delinquent under
    provision of Section 13 of Chapter 204 of the
    General Laws of the Regular Session of the Forty-
    eighth Legislature, 1943, (Sec. 13, Article 2338-
    1, of Vernon’s 1948 Statutes), and the Court does not
    release such child unconditionally, or place him on
    probation or in a suitable public or private insti-
    tution or agency other than a State Training School,
    the Court shall commit him to the (State Youth De-
    velopment) Council, but may suspend the execution
    of the order of such commitment.”
    In view of Sections 13(c) and 17 of Article 2338-l
    and Article 5143c, Section 12, which must be harmonized and
    considered together, we are of the opinion that it is manifest
    that a juvenile court judge has no power or authority whatsoever
    to order a juvenile delinquent committed to a county jail to
    serve a sentence.
    SUMMARY
    (1) A deputy sheriff has no ex officio
    authority to act as a county juvenile officer,
    with the exception of the duties relating to
    juveniles set forth in Article 2338-l(7),
    Vernon’s Civil Statutes. However, a sheriff
    may authorize one of his deputies to investigate
    and handle juvenile matters and to report the
    findings of his investigations to the County
    Attorney.
    (2) A juvenile court judge has no authority,
    pursuant to Sections 13(c) and 17 of Article 2338-1,
    Vernon’s Civil Statutes, to order the commitment
    of a juvenile delinquent to a county jail other
    than for temporary detention pending his other
    disposition.
    n
    y General of Texas
    -3730-
    Hon. Andy Shuval, page 6   (M-763)
    Prepared by Austin C. Bray, Jr.
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
    Dan Green
    Sam Jones
    Gordon Cass
    Scott Garrison
    MEADE F. GRIFFIN
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    First Assistant
    -3731-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-763

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1970

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017