United States v. Garcia ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Case: 20-40377      Document: 00516165306         Page: 1    Date Filed: 01/13/2022
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit                             United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    January 13, 2022
    No. 20-40377                        Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    United States of America,
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    Angel Mondragon Garcia,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 5:19-CR-2156-1
    ON REMAND FROM
    THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
    Before Barksdale, Graves, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:*
    In January 2020, Angel Mondragon Garcia pleaded guilty to illegal
    reentry into the United States, in violation of 
    8 U.S.C. §§ 1326
    (a) and (b)(2).
    He was sentenced that June to, inter alia, 37 months’ imprisonment.
    *
    Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
    Case: 20-40377     Document: 00516165306           Page: 2    Date Filed: 01/13/2022
    No. 20-40377
    Garcia appealed, contending, inter alia: the district court plainly erred
    in treating his prior Texas conviction for aggravated assault as a crime of
    violence under 
    18 U.S.C. § 16
     (defining crime of violence) and, therefore, as
    an aggravated felony pursuant to 
    8 U.S.C. § 1101
    (a)(43)(F) (defining
    aggravated felony as crime of violence) and § 1326(b)(2) (criminal penalties
    for reentry of certain removed aliens). Because he did not preserve the
    aggravated-assault issue in district court, review was only for plain error.
    E.g., United States v. Broussard, 
    669 F.3d 537
    , 546 (5th Cir. 2012). Garcia
    maintained his prior Texas conviction for aggravated assault—in violation of
    Texas Penal Code § 22.02(a)—did not constitute a crime of violence because
    the Texas conviction included reckless conduct, which does not involve “the
    use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force” element required by
    § 16. See 
    18 U.S.C. § 16
    (a).
    Our court affirmed, based on our precedent providing that Garcia’s
    violation of Texas Penal Code § 22.02(a) constituted a crime of violence. See
    United States v. Gracia-Cantu, 
    920 F.3d 252
    , 253–54 (5th Cir. 2019) (per
    curiam) (holding conviction under Texas Penal Code § 22.01(a)(1), which §
    22.02(a) incorporates, is a crime of violence). (We also remanded in part for
    the limited purpose of the court’s correcting the written judgment to
    conform to its oral pronouncement at sentencing. That issue is not before
    our court on remand.) United States v. Garcia, 838 Fed. App’x 901 (5th Cir.
    2021) (per curiam).
    The Supreme Court has since held:           the definition of “violent
    felony”—requiring “use of physical force against the person of another”—
    does not include reckless behavior. See Borden v. United States, 
    141 S. Ct. 1817
    , 1825 (2021) (plurality opinion).
    2
    Case: 20-40377      Document: 00516165306          Page: 3   Date Filed: 01/13/2022
    No. 20-40377
    Accordingly, the Court granted Garcia’s petition for a writ of
    certiorari, vacated our decision, and remanded for further consideration in
    the light of Borden.
    Garcia is scheduled to be released on 9 June 2022. Therefore, this
    matter is REMANDED to district court for expedited consideration of
    Garcia’s sentence in the light of Borden.
    REMANDED FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-40377

Filed Date: 1/13/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2022