Chadrick Eugene Bradley v. the State of Texas ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                        In The
    Court of Appeals
    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
    __________________
    NO. 09-21-00271-CR
    NO. 09-21-00272-CR
    __________________
    CHADRICK EUGENE BRADLEY, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    __________________________________________________________________
    On Appeal from the 221st District Court
    Montgomery County, Texas
    Trial Cause Nos. 20-01-00617-CR and 21-02-02579-CR
    __________________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    On August 31, 2021, the trial court sentenced Chadrick Eugene Bradley in
    trial cause numbers 20-01-00617-CR and 21-02-02579-CR. Bradley filed notices of
    appeal and motions for new trial. On November 9, 2021, the trial court granted
    Bradley’s motions for new trial as to punishment only. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.9(c);
    see also State v. Davis, 
    349 S.W.3d 535
    , 537 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (trial courts
    have the authority to grant new trials on punishment). We notified the parties that it
    1
    appeared Bradley’s notices of appeal did not invoke our appellate jurisdiction,
    because the trial court granted motions for new trial within the time permitted by the
    Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. We gave the parties until December 29, 2021,
    to file a response that showed this Court has jurisdiction over appeals of the trial
    court’s judgments. No party filed a response.
    Generally, an appeal may be taken by a defendant in a criminal case only after
    a final conviction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a) (establishing time for appeal by a
    defendant after a sentence is imposed in open court or the trial court signs an
    appealable order). The notices of appeal were timely filed, but the trial court later
    vacated the judgments while it retained plenary power over the judgments. See Tex.
    R. App. P. 21.8(a). Therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeals.
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
    APPEALS DISMISSED.
    PER CURIAM
    Submitted on January 11, 2022
    Opinion Delivered January 12, 2022
    Do Not Publish
    Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-21-00271-CR

Filed Date: 1/12/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/14/2022