Morgan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 20-1286V
    UNPUBLISHED
    CASEY R. MORGAN,                                        Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                         Filed: December 29, 2021
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                 Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                         Table Injury; Meningococcal Vaccine;
    Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                          Administration (SIRVA)
    Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.
    Zoe Wade, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1
    On September 29, 2020, Casey Morgan filed a petition for compensation under
    the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (SIRVA) as the result of a Meningococcal B vaccination he received on
    July 5, 2019. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the
    Office of Special Masters.
    On December 29, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he
    concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c)
    Report at 1. Specifically, Petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of
    his left shoulder; Petitioner’s pain was limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was
    1
    Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
    to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act
    of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
    Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
    with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
    the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
    the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    administered; Petitioner’s pain occurred within 48 hours after receipt of an intramuscular
    vaccination; and no other condition or abnormality has been identified to explain
    Petitioner’s shoulder pain. Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that Petitioner suffered the
    residual effects of his condition for more than six months. Id.
    In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
    Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-1286

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 2/1/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/2/2022