Norman Williams v. Romarm, SA ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    ____________
    No. 21-7010                                                September Term, 2021
    1:19-cv-00183-EGS
    Filed On: February 3, 2022
    Norman Williams, et al.,
    Appellants
    v.
    Romarm, SA, Manufacturer, Importer and
    Distributor of Semiautomatic Assault Weapon
    WASR10, Ser. No. CA4367-70,
    Appellee
    ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    BEFORE: Wilkins, Rao, and Jackson, Circuit Judges
    JUDGMENT
    This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court
    for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P.
    34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
    ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the appeal be dismissed for lack of
    jurisdiction. This court’s order filed June 15, 2021 directed the parties to address (1)
    whether this court has jurisdiction over the appeal when the notice of appeal designated
    only a non-existent order and judgment entered on January 15, 2021, (2) whether this
    court has jurisdiction over an appeal of the district court’s April 1, 2020 order, and (3)
    whether this court has jurisdiction over an appeal of the district court’s rulings imposing
    sanctions on appellants’ attorney. Appellants have failed to address any of these
    issues in their brief, see United States ex rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp., 
    380 F.3d 488
    , 497 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (arguments not raised on appeal are forfeited), and thus have
    not established that this court may exercise jurisdiction over the district court’s April 1,
    2020 and January 14, 2021 orders.
    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    ____________
    No. 21-7010                                                September Term, 2021
    Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk
    is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
    of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.
    P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
    Per Curiam
    FOR THE COURT:
    Mark J. Langer, Clerk
    BY:     /s/
    Daniel J. Reidy
    Deputy Clerk
    Page 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-7010

Filed Date: 2/3/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/3/2022