Barlow v. Commonwealth , 3 Binn. 1 ( 1810 )


Menu:
  • Tilghman C. J.

    delivered the Court’s opinion.

    This is an indictment for perjury. Barlow was convicted in the court of Quarter Sessions of Luzerne county, and judgment was given in November 1806, that he should be imprisoned at hard labour, &c. for two years in the gaol of the county of Philadelphia, and pay a fine of ten dollars. The error assigned is, in that part óf the judgment which directs the imprisonment to be in the county of Philadelphia.

    By the actof 21st March 1806, the court before whom any person is convicted offelony or larceny, and sentenced to undergo imprisonment at hard labour, &c. for any term not exceeding three years, may direct the imprisonment, &c. to be in the gaol of any county within the commonwealth, or in the gaol and penitentiary of Philadelphia.

    By the act ob 3d April 1804, a person convicted of per*3jury, may be punished by imprisonment at hard labour, &c. for any term not exceeding seven years, at the discretion of the court before whom he was convicted.

    From the above review of the several acts of assembly on this subject, it appears, that a person convicted out of the county of Philadelphia, of any offence, other than felony or larcenv, could not be sentenced to imprisonment, &c. in the gaol of the county of Philadelphia. An alteration has been made by the act of 4th April 1807, which can have no effect on this case, being subsequent to the judgment. The Court are therefore of opinion, that the judgment of the court of General Quarter Sessions, for the county of Luzerne, was erroneous, and must be reversed.

    Judgment reversed.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 3 Binn. 1

Judges: Tilghman

Filed Date: 6/6/1810

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2022