Marcus Dwight Booth v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed March 8, 2018
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    __________
    Nos. 11-18-00011-CR, 11-18-00012-CR, & 11-18-00013-CR
    __________
    MARCUS DWIGHT BOOTH, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 385th District Court
    Midland County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause Nos. CR42435, CR42436, & CR42437
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Marcus Dwight Booth, Appellant, filed an untimely pro se notice of appeal
    from his convictions for the offenses of possession of a controlled substance,
    tampering with physical evidence, and assault on a public servant. We dismiss the
    appeals.
    The documents on file in these cases indicate that Appellant’s sentences were
    imposed on July 14, 2014, and that his pro se notice of appeal was filed in the district
    clerk’s office on January 8, 2018. When the appeals were filed in this court, we
    notified Appellant by letter that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and
    that the appeals may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We requested that
    Appellant respond to our letter and show grounds to continue these appeals.
    Appellant has not filed a response.
    Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2, Appellant’s notice of appeal in each case
    was due to be filed within thirty days after the date his sentence was imposed in open
    court. A notice of appeal must be in writing and filed with the clerk of the trial court.
    TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c)(1).              The documents on file in this court reflect that
    Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed with the clerk of the trial court more than three
    years after his sentences were imposed. The notice of appeal was, therefore,
    untimely. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of a timely motion
    for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain these appeals. Slaton v.
    State, 
    981 S.W.2d 208
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    (Tex.
    Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 
    860 S.W.2d 108
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1993).
    Because we have no jurisdiction, we must dismiss the appeals.
    These appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
    PER CURIAM
    March 8, 2018
    Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Panel consists of: Willson, J.,
    Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1
    1
    Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland,
    sitting by assignment.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-18-00012-CR

Filed Date: 3/8/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/9/2018