Erik Catorce Madrid v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                  COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
    FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
    CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER
    Appellate case name:       Erik Catorce Madrid v. The State of Texas
    Appellate case number:     01-15-00977-CR
    Trial court case number: 1970160
    Trial court:               County Criminal Court at Law No 4 of Harris County
    On December 8, 2015, this Court issued an order, abating the appeal and directing the
    trial court to supplement the clerk’s record with the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s
    right to appeal, or if none was previously entered, to hold a hearing and execute a certification
    and forward it to this Court in a supplemental clerk’s record. We asked that this occur by
    January 7, 2016. To date, we have not received a supplemental clerk’s record. Accordingly, we
    issue the following continuing abatement order.
    The clerk’s record does not include a copy of the trial court’s certification of appellant’s
    right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 34.5(a)(12), 37.1; see also Ex parte Tarango, 
    116 S.W.3d 201
    , 203 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2003, no pet.). If the trial court executed a certification,
    the trial court clerk is directed to supplement the clerk’s record with this certification. If no
    certification has been executed, we direct the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing at
    which a representative of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office and appellant’s counsel, if
    any, shall be present. Appellant shall also be present for the hearing in person or, if appellant is
    incarcerated, at the trial court’s discretion, appellant may participate in the hearing by closed-
    circuit video teleconferencing.1
    We direct the trial court to:
    1) Execute a certification of appellant’s right to appeal; and
    2) Make any other findings and recommendations the trial court deems appropriate.
    1      Any such teleconference must use a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that
    provides for a simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication
    of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys representing the
    State or appellant. On request of appellant, appellant and his counsel shall be able to
    communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney
    representing the State.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), (f), 34.5(a)(12), (c)(2), 37.1.
    The trial court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing. The trial
    court clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification of
    appellant’s right to appeal and any other findings, recommendations, and orders of the trial court,
    with this Court no later than 15 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    34.5(c)(2).
    The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active
    docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental clerk’s
    record is filed with the Clerk of this Court. The court coordinator of the trial court shall set a
    hearing date and notify the parties.
    It is so ORDERED.
    Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle
     Acting individually
    Date: January 26, 2016
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-15-00977-CR

Filed Date: 1/26/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/27/2016