Qasim Sajidin Gardezi v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Order filed August 23, 2018
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    ____________
    NO. 14-18-00077-CR
    ____________
    QASIM SAJIDIN GARDEZI, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 248th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 1574447
    ORDER
    When appellant’s retained counsel filed a motion in this court to withdraw,
    we abated the appeal and directed the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine if
    appellant desires to continue to prosecute to appeal and, if so, whether he is indigent
    and therefore entitled to a free record and appointed counsel on appeal. Tex. R. App.
    P. 38.8.
    The trial court conducted that hearing on June 19, 2018. Appellant stated he
    did not wish to have appellate counsel appointed for him. He stated he would hire
    his own attorney or represent himself. The trial court found appellant is not indigent.
    We reinstated the appeal on June 29, 2018, and set appellant’s brief due July
    30, 2018. No brief was filed. On July 31, 2018, we notified appellant that if he did
    not, within ten days, file a motion for extension of time to file the brief, we would
    take appropriate action. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2).
    Rule 38.8 provides that we will not dismiss or consider the appeal without
    briefs unless it is shown the appellant no longer desires to prosecute his appeal or
    that he is not indigent and has failed to make necessary arrangements for filing a
    brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8. The rule was designed to protect an indigent appellant
    from the failure of his appointed counsel to provide a brief. The rule further provides
    that under appropriate circumstances, “the appellate court may consider the appeal
    without briefs, as justice may require.” Tex. R. App. P. 38.8 (b)(4).
    A hearing has already been held as required under Rule 38.8. Because the trial
    court has already held one hearing to make the findings required under Rule 38.8,
    and we can find nothing in the rules or case law which requires this court to once
    again send this matter back to the trial court, we decline to do so.
    Therefore, we ORDER appellant to file a brief in this appeal by September
    24, 2018. If appellant fails to file his brief as ordered, we will decide this appeal
    upon the record before the court. See Lott v. State, 
    874 S.W.2d 687
    , 688 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 1994) (affirming conviction on record alone where appellant failed to file a pro
    se brief after being properly admonished).
    PER CURIAM
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-18-00077-CR

Filed Date: 8/23/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/24/2018