Daniel Sherman Brown v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                     COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
    FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
    ABATEMENT ORDER
    Appellate case name:        Daniel Sherman Brown v. The State of Texas
    Appellate case numbers: 01-15-00291-CR; 01-15-292-CR; 01-15-00293-CR
    Trial court case numbers: 1414895, 1422157; 1422158
    Trial court:                183rd District Court of Harris County
    Appellant’s brief was originally due on September 30, 2015. Two extensions were
    granted until December 4, 2015. No brief was filed. On December 23, 2015, notice issued that
    the brief was late and gave appointed counsel ten days to respond. No response was received.
    When an appellant in a criminal case fails to file a brief, Rule 38.8(b)(4) requires the
    appellate court to issue an order, directing the trial court to hold a hearing and make certain
    findings. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.3(b)(2)-(3). If the trial court finds that appellant no longer desires
    to prosecute the appeal, or that appellant is not indigent, but has not made the necessary
    arrangements for filing a brief, the appellant court may consider the appeal without briefs. 
    Id. at 38.8(b)(4).
    Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing at
    which appellant and appointed counsel, Kelly Ann Smith, shall be present in person. 1 The court
    coordinator of the trial court shall set a date for said hearing and notify the parties, including
    appellant. We direct the trial court to make appropriate written findings of fact and conclusions
    of law and to execute any necessary orders on these issues:
    1) Whether appellant still wishes to pursue this appeal;
    2) If so, whether appointed counsel, Kelly Ann Smith, has abandoned the appeal and
    other counsel should be appointed; and
    3) To set a date certain (in no event to be more than 30 days from the date of the
    1      If appellant is now incarcerated, he may appear by closed video teleconference. Any such teleconference
    must use a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a simultaneous compressed full
    motion video and interactive communication of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any
    attorneys representing the State or appellant. On request, appellant and his counsel shall be able to
    communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney representing the
    State.
    abatement hearing) for appellant to file a brief.
    See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(a), (f); TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b).
    The trial court’s findings and recommendations (separate and apart from any docket sheet
    notation) and any orders issued pursuant to this hearing shall be included in a supplemental
    clerk’s record and filed in this Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order. The
    trial court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing and file the reporter’s
    record with the Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order. Additionally, if the
    hearing is conducted by video teleconference, a certified electronic copy of the hearing shall be
    filed in this Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order.
    The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active
    docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental
    clerk’s record and reporter’s record of the hearing are filed in this Court.
    It is so ORDERED.
    Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle
     Acting individually       Acting for the Court
    Date: January 21, 2016
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-15-00293-CR

Filed Date: 1/21/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/22/2016