motor-coach-industries-mexico-sa-de-c-v-fka-dina-autobuses-sa-de-c ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                               IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-06-00256-CV
    MCI SALES AND SERVICE, INC., F/K/A HAUSMAN BUS SALES, INC.,
    AND MOTOR COACH INDUSTRIES MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V.,
    F/K/A DINA AUTOBUSES, S.A. DE C.V.,
    Appellants
    v.
    JAMES HINTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
    ESTATE OF DOLORES HINTON, DECEASED, DAVID HINTON,
    ROBERT KURYLA, KAREN KURYLA, HATTIE BINNS, RETA HAYNES,
    MELINDA GREGER, ALAN HORTON, ELAINE HORTON, RUTH POWELL,
    JUDY BENSON, JAMES L. FREEMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
    PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JO CATHERINE
    FREEMAN, DECEASED, JAMES F. FREEMAN, MELANIE JO BROOKS,
    SUSAN AKERS BILLS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE
    ESTATES OF ROBERT MELVIN AKERS, DECEASED, AND MILDRED
    DELOIS AKERS, DECEASED, ROBERT MELVIN AKERS, JR., PATSY
    BEASLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF
    WAYNE BEASLEY, DECEASED, SHIRLEY SOMMER, AND PEGGY
    ARMSTRONG,
    Appellees
    From the 170th District Court
    McLennan County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2003-2308-4
    DISSENTING OPINION
    The events of this case are tragic. But the state law crashworthiness design
    claims being made by the plaintiffs against the manufacturer of the bus are pre-empted
    by federal law. And in recognition of the benefits of a single regulatory entity for all
    states in the United States, the expanse of preemption is widening.         See Riegel v.
    Medtronic, Inc., ___ U.S. ___, 
    128 S. Ct. 999
    , 1011, 
    169 L. Ed. 2d 892
    , 906-907, 2008 U.S.
    LEXIS 2013, *29-30 (2008) (tort claims challenging safety & effectiveness of catheter);
    Carden v. General Motors Corp., 
    509 F.3d 227
    , 230-232 (5th Cir. 2007) (tort claims
    challenging design of seat belts); Bic Pen Corp. v. Carter, 
    251 S.W.3d 500
    , 504-509 (Tex.
    2008) (common law challenge of design defect of BIC lighter). See also Delta Air Lines,
    Inc. v. Black 
    116 S.W.3d 745
    (Tex. 2003) (challenge of airline passenger boarding
    procedures). The judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered.
    I respectfully dissent.
    TOM GRAY
    Chief Justice
    Dissenting opinion delivered and filed September 10, 2008
    MCI Sales and Service, Inc. v. Hinton                                              Page 2