Willie Allen Boudry v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                    Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-18-00517-CR
    Willie Allen BOUDRY,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2018CR4039W
    Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:          Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
    Karen Angelini, Justice
    Marialyn Barnard, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: August 22, 2018
    DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
    The trial court imposed sentence in the underlying cause on May 10, 2018. Because
    appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed June 11, 2018.
    TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on
    June 26, 2018. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on July 20, 2018, 1 but
    appellant did not file a motion for extension of time in this court.
    1
    We construe appellant’s motion for leave to file late notice of appeal filed in the trial court as a notice of appeal. See
    Harkcom v. State, 
    484 S.W.3d 432
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2016).
    04-18-00517-CR
    A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. See Olivo
    v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be considered
    timely so as to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction if (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last
    day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within
    fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the court of appeals
    grants the motion for extension of time. See 
    id. Because it
    appeared from the record that
    appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely filed, appellant was ordered to show cause in writing
    why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 2 See 
    id. Appellant’s attorney
    filed a written response conceding that this court is required to dismiss the appeal. Because
    appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely filed, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
    See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 
    802 S.W.2d 241
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (out-of-time appeal
    from final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article
    11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure).
    PER CURIAM
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    2
    In our show cause order, we also noted the trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a
    plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal,” and rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal
    has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-18-00517-CR

Filed Date: 8/22/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/23/2018