Lazaro Matos Rodriguez v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 28, 2018.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-17-00834-CR
    LAZARO MATOS RODRIGUEZ, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 23rd District Court
    Brazoria County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 80311-CR
    MEMORANDUM                      OPINION
    Appellant appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery. Appellant’s
    appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous
    and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and
    demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State,
    
    573 S.W.2d 807
    , 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
    A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised
    of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford
    v. State, 
    813 S.W.2d 503
    , 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than 60
    days have passed and no pro se response has been filed.
    We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the
    appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in
    the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief
    or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for
    review. See Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    , 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
    Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Donovan, Wise, and Jewell.
    Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-17-00834-CR

Filed Date: 8/28/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/28/2018