United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Organization United for Respect at Walmart, North Texas Jobs With Justice, and Lester Eugene Lantz v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, Wal-Mart Realty Company, Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, and Sam's East, Inc. ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                          COURT OF APPEALS
    SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    FORT WORTH
    NO. 02-15-00374-CV
    United Food and Commercial               §    From the 352nd District Court
    Workers International Union;
    Organization United for Respect at
    Walmart; North Texas Jobs With           §    of Tarrant County (352-266419-13)
    Justice; and Lester Eugene Lantz
    v.                                       §    October 27, 2016
    Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; Wal-Mart Real     §    Opinion by Justice Gabriel
    Estate Business Trust; Wal-Mart
    Realty Company; Wal-Mart Stores
    Texas, LLC; Wal-Mart Stores East,
    LP; and Sam's East, Inc.
    JUDGMENT
    This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that
    there was no error in the trial court’s summary judgment. Although the trial court
    did not abuse its discretion in granting Walmart permanent injunctive relief based
    on its claims that were established as a matter of law, the scope of paragraph “c.”
    was overly broad so as to prohibit lawful activities within Walmart’s limited
    business invitation to the public. Therefore, we modify paragraph “c.” of the
    permanent injunction to state that the following conduct is enjoined:
    Entering on Walmart’s private property at any store or facility in the
    State of Texas that is owned or controlled by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,
    Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, Wal-Mart Realty Company,
    Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Sam’s East,
    Inc., or any of their subsidiaries, affiliates, or operating entities for
    any non-shopping, labor-related purpose.
    See Ghidoni v. Stone Oak, Inc., 
    966 S.W.2d 573
    , 583 (Tex. App.―San
    Antonio 1998, pet. denied) (en banc op. on reh’g) (modifying overly broad
    permanent injunction).     As modified, we affirm the trial court’s permanent
    injunction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(b).
    It is further ordered that all parties shall bear their own costs of this appeal,
    for which let execution issue.
    SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
    By /s/ Lee Gabriel
    Justice Lee Gabriel
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-15-00374-CV

Filed Date: 10/27/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/1/2016