Shane Hoyt Bradshaw v. State ( 2018 )

In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-18-00084-CR
____________________
SHANE HOYT BRADSHAW, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 253rd District Court
Liberty County, Texas
Trial Cause No. CR32205
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Shane Hoyt Bradshaw
pleaded guilty to assault involving family violence. The trial court found Bradshaw
guilty and assessed punishment at two years of confinement, then suspended
imposition of sentence, placed Bradshaw on community supervision for two years,
and assessed a $750 fine. Subsequently, the State filed a motion to revoke
Bradshaw’s community supervision. Bradshaw pleaded “not true” to the seven
alleged violations of the terms of the community supervision order. After conducting
1
an evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that Bradshaw violated the terms of the
community supervision order, revoked Bradshaw’s community supervision, and
imposed a sentence of two years of confinement.
Bradshaw’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s
professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1978). On May 24, 2018, we granted an extension of time for Bradshaw
to file a pro se brief. We received no response from Bradshaw.
We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel’s conclusion
that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order
appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d
503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment. 1
AFFIRMED.
______________________________
STEVE McKEITHEN
Chief Justice
1
Bradshaw may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for
discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
2
Submitted on September 6, 2018
Opinion Delivered September 19, 2018
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
3