Theresa Johnson v. Monica Velez, Kylie Riney, Kathryn Miller, and Patrice Wise ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
    NO. 03-18-00764-CV
    Theresa Johnson, Appellant
    v.
    Monica Velez, Kylie Riney, Kathryn Miller, and Patrice Wise, Appellees
    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 169TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    NO. 296,602-C, HONORABLE GORDON G. ADAMS, JUDGE PRESIDING
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    On December 14, 2018, this Court notified appellant Theresa Johnson that her notice
    of appeal—that was filed on November 15, 2018—appeared untimely and that the appeal would be
    dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless she filed a response explaining how this Court has
    jurisdiction over this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a) (allowing appellate court to dismiss case
    for want of jurisdiction after giving ten days’ notice to parties). To date, Johnson has not filed
    a response.
    In the underlying proceeding, the trial court signed a final order granting appellees’
    amended motion to dismiss on June 18, 2018. The order states that it “is a final order that disposes
    of all claims and causes of action” filed by Johnson against appellees. Johnson timely filed a motion
    for new trial, which the trial court denied on September 14, 2018. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 320, 329b.
    Purporting to appeal from the trial court’s order denying the motion for new trial, Johnson filed a
    notice of appeal on November 15, 2018.
    Although appellant’s motion for new trial extended the deadline for filing a notice
    of appeal, the applicable time period for perfecting an appeal began on June 18, 2018, the date that
    the trial court signed the order granting appellees’ amended motion to dismiss. See Tex. R. App. P.
    26.1(a) (requiring notice of appeal to be filed within 90 days after judgment or order signed when
    party timely files motion for new trial); Tex. R. Civ. P. 301 (“Only one final judgment shall be
    rendered in any cause except where it is otherwise specifically provided by law.”); In re Vaishangi,
    Inc., 
    442 S.W.3d 256
    , 260 (Tex. 2014) (orig. proceeding) (“[A] trial court can render only one
    judgment in a case.”); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 195 (Tex. 2001) (explaining that
    “general rule, with a few mostly statutory exceptions, is that an appeal may be taken only from a
    final judgment”). Thus, Johnson’s deadline for filing a notice of appeal was on or before
    September 17, 2018, or, with a timely filed motion for extension of time, October 2, 2018. See
    Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a), 26.3 (allowing fifteen day extension of time to file notice of appeal);
    Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617 (Tex. 1997). Johnson, however, did not file her notice
    of appeal until November 15, 2018. Because Johnson’s notice of appeal was untimely, we do not
    have jurisdiction to consider this appeal and we dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App.
    P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
    2
    __________________________________________
    Melissa Goodwin, Justice
    Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana
    Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
    Filed: January 11, 2019
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-18-00764-CV

Filed Date: 1/11/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/14/2019