in Re Silsbee Police Association, Joshua Alan Lawrence, Lashawn Brandi McBride Steven Robert McBride, Angela Teresa Rogers, Justin Lynn Rogers, and Taylor Garrett Rogers ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                      In The
    Court of Appeals
    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
    _________________
    NO. 09-18-00322-CV
    _________________
    IN RE SILSBEE POLICE ASSOCIATION, JOSHUA ALAN LAWRENCE,
    LASHAWN BRANDI MCBRIDE, STEVEN ROBERT MCBRIDE, ANGELA
    TERESA ROGERS, JUSTIN LYN ROGERS, AND TAYLOR GARRETT
    ROGERS
    ________________________________________________________________________
    Original Proceeding
    ________________________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Relators Silsbee Police Association, Joshua Alan Lawrence, Lashawn Brandi
    McBride, Steven Robert McBride, Angela Teresa Rogers, Justin Lyn Rogers, and
    Taylor Garrett Rogers filed a petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. Elec. Code
    Ann. § 273.061 (West 2010); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relators ask this Court to
    compel the respondents, Mayor Jim Willis, City Secretary DeeAnn Zimmerman, the
    City of Silsbee, and the Silsbee City Council, which consists of Susan Kay Bard,
    Christopher Barnes, Adalaide Cash Balaban, Thomas Tyler, Gary Strahan, and Mark
    1
    Muckleroy, to immediately perform their respective ministerial duties as required
    by the Charter of the City of Silsbee, by placing relators’ proposed charter
    amendment on the Texas uniform election date ballot for the November 6, 2018,
    Texas uniform election date.
    The charter for the City of Silsbee allows its charter to be amended in the
    manner provided by Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code. See Silsbee,
    Tex.     Charter,   art.   XII,   Sec.    12.13    (2018)    (available    online   at
    https://library.municode.com/tx/Silsbee/codes/code_of_ordinances). Section 9.004
    of the Local Government Code requires the governing body of a municipality to
    submit a proposed charter amendment to the voters for their approval
    at an election if the submission is supported by a petition signed by a
    number of qualified voters of the municipality equal to at least five
    percent of the number of qualified voters of the municipality or 20,000,
    whichever number is the smaller.
    Tex. Loc. Gov’t Code Ann. § 9.004(a) (West 2008). Relators assert they satisfied
    the requisites for including a charter amendment by submitting a petition signed by
    at least five percent of the registered voters of the municipality. Although the
    proposed charter amendment was on the agenda for the August 20, 2018, meeting of
    the Silsbee City Council, the members of the City Council voted to exclude the
    proposed charter amendment from the November 6, 2018, Texas uniform election
    date.
    2
    The respondents filed a response but did not controvert the accuracy and
    authenticity of the affidavit and attached documents filed in the appendix to relators’
    mandamus petition, nor have they controverted the factual assertions that relators
    complied with the requisites for having the proposed Charter amendment submitted
    to the voters. Instead, the City asserted that the petition for writ of mandamus was
    filed too late for effective compliance, and this Court could not order the requested
    relief.
    Section 9.004(b) of the Local Government Code states: “[t]he ordinance
    ordering the election shall provide for the election to be held on the first authorized
    uniform election date prescribed by the Election Code[.]” 
    Id. § 9.004(b).
    Section
    3.005(c) of the Election Code provides that “[f]or an election to be held on a uniform
    election date, the election shall be ordered not later than the 78th day before election
    day.” Tex. Elec. Code Ann. § 3.005(c) (West Supp. 2017). Relators filed the Original
    Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus with this Court on August 23, 2018, only
    75 days before the uniform election date. Thus, regardless of the merits of relators’
    claims, this Court may not grant the requested relief because the time has passed for
    ordering the proposed charter amendment to be placed on the November 6, 2018,
    ballot. See 
    id. Accordingly, we
    deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
    3
    PETITION DENIED.
    PER CURIAM
    Submitted on September 4, 2018
    Opinion Delivered September 5, 2018
    Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-18-00322-CV

Filed Date: 9/5/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/8/2018