Ex Parte Austin Lyman Bishop ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                 COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
    FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
    ORDER OF ABATEMENT
    Appellate case name:         Ex parte Austin Lyman Bishop
    Appellate case number:       01-17-00923-CR
    Trial court case number:     17486A
    Trial court:                 21st District Court of Washington County
    Appellant, Austin Lyman Bishop, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s
    denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN.
    art. 11.072 (West Supp. 2017). The clerk’s record was filed in this Court on December
    13, 2017. The clerk’s record, however, does not include a signed, written order denying
    appellant’s requested habeas relief or written findings of fact and conclusions of law.
    And, the clerk’s record does not include a copy of the trial court’s certification of
    appellant’s right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(a)(12), 37.1.
    Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court for
    appellant to obtain, from the trial court, a signed, written order on his application for a
    writ of habeas corpus and for the trial court to enter written findings of fact and
    conclusions of law, separate and apart from any docket sheet notations in this case, in
    conjunction with the denial of appellant’s application for a writ of habeas corpus. See
    TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.072, § 7(a) (“If the court determines from the face
    of the application or documents attached to the application that the applicant is manifestly
    entitled to no relief, the court shall enter a written order denying the application as
    frivolous. In any other case, the trial court shall enter a written order including findings
    of fact and conclusions of law.”).
    We further direct the trial court to execute a certification of appellant’s right to
    appeal that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) and indicates
    whether appellant has the right to appeal.1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). This Court
    1      The clerk’s record includes appellants “Notice of Appeal and Request for Certification of
    Right to Appeal” with the trial court’s handwritten and signed note, “[i]f Court Appeals
    requests a certification of right to appeal, I will comply.”
    must dismiss the appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal
    has not been made part of the record under these rules.” 
    Id. 25.2(d), 37.1;
    Ex parte
    Tarango, 
    116 S.W.3d 201
    , 203 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2003, no pet.). However, the Texas
    Rules of Appellate Procedure prohibit us from dismissing an appeal based on the lack of
    a valid certification when we determine that an appellant has a right of appeal. See TEX.
    R. APP. P. 25.2(f), 37.1, 44.4.
    The trial court clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing (1)
    the certification of appellant’s right of appeal, (2) any signed order on appellant’s
    application for a writ of habeas corpus, (3) the trial court’s findings of fact and
    conclusions of law in conjunction with the denial of appellant’s application for a writ of
    habeas corpus, and (4) any other findings or recommendations the trial court deems
    appropriate. The supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with this Court no later than
    30 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c) (2).
    The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s
    active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the
    supplemental clerk’s record, complying with this order, is filed with the Clerk of this
    Court.
    It is so ORDERED.
    Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd
     Acting individually       Acting for the Court
    Date: December 28, 2017
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-17-00923-CR

Filed Date: 12/28/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/1/2018