B. H. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services ( 2018 )

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-18-00101-CV
B. H., Appellant
v.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. D-1-FM-17-002450, HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant B.H., who is the respondent father of the subject child, has filed a notice
of appeal from an order in aid of an investigation by the Texas Department of Family and Protective
Services of a report of child abuse or neglect. In the order, the trial court authorized a forensic
interview of B.H.’s child and ordered B.H. to fully cooperate with the Department’s investigation.
On February 22, 2018, this Court notified the parties that our appellate jurisdiction was questionable
and requested a response from B.H. that explained how this Court may exercise jurisdiction over
this appeal.
B.H. has filed a response in which he contends that this Court has jurisdiction because
the order being appealed is a final judgment that disposes of all pending parties and claims. We,
however, have not found authority that would support the exercise of appellate jurisdiction here. See
Tex. Fam. Code § 261.303 (authorizing trial courts to enter orders in aid of investigations by
Department of reports of child abuse or neglect); In re Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs.,
255 S.W.3d 613, 615 (Tex. 2008) (describing order entered pursuant to section 261.303 of Family
Code as temporary order); In re S.D., No. 09-11-00192-CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 4893, at *1–2
(Tex. App.—Beaumont June 30, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.) (concluding that order in aid of
investigation of child abuse or neglect was temporary order that was not subject to interlocutory
appeal and dismissing appeal for want of jurisdiction); see also Tex. Fam. Code § 105.001(e)
(explaining that temporary orders entered under section are not subject to interlocutory appeal).
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
__________________________________________
Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: March 9, 2018
2