Samuel R. Builta AKA Sam Builta Individually and Dba Technical Services System v. Paragon, Inc. ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                             Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    December 15, 2017
    No. 04-17-00716-CV
    Samuel R. BUILTA aka Sam Builta Individually and dba Technical Services System,
    Appellants
    v.
    PARAGON, INC.,
    Appellee
    From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 393227
    Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    In the case underlying this appeal, the trial court signed a final judgment on August 4,
    2017. The deadline to file a timely motion for new trial was September 5, 2017. See TEX. R.
    CIV. P. 329b(a). If a timely motion for new trial is not filed, an appellant’s notice of appeal must
    be filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. An untimely
    motion for new trial does not extend the time to file a notice of appeal. See id.; State Office of
    Risk Mgmt. v. Berdan, 
    335 S.W.3d 421
    , 428 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2011, pet. denied); see
    also Stroman v. Martinez, No. 01-14-00991-CV, 
    2015 WL 1926015
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston
    [1st Dist.] Apr. 28, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.).
    Here, Appellant’s motion for new trial was filed on September 6, 2017, one day after the
    motion was due. It appears that the motion for new trial was not timely filed, and the deadline to
    file Appellant’s notice of appeal was not extended. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1); TEX. R. CIV.
    P. 329b(a); 
    Berdan, 335 S.W.3d at 428
    .
    Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed on September 5, 2017, and a motion for
    extension of time to file a notice of appeal was due on September 20, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    26.1, 26.3. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on October 27, 2017. It appears to be
    untimely.
    We ORDER Appellant to SHOW CAUSE in writing within TEN DAYS of the date of
    this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    42.3(a); 
    Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617
    (“[O]nce the period for granting a motion for extension of
    time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court’s
    jurisdiction.”). If Appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be
    dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
    All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.
    _________________________________
    Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 15th day of December, 2017.
    ___________________________________
    KEITH E. HOTTLE,
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-17-00716-CV

Filed Date: 12/15/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/19/2017