RR Stanley, Dalton Davis D/B/A JO-DAN Royalty Company and Vinella Davis v. Deborah Cephus Collins, Will Cephus, Harold Andrews, Rosalind Carter and Rondal Cephus ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                  NUMBER 13-18-00040-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    RR STANLEY, DALTON DAVIS D/B/A JO-DAN
    ROYALTY COMPANY AND VINELLA DAVIS,                                                       Appellants,
    v.
    DEBORAH CEPHUS COLLINS, WILL CEPHUS,
    HAROLD ANDREWS, ROSALIND CARTER AND
    RONDAL CEPHUS,                                                                            Appellees.
    On Appeal from the 77th District Court
    of Freestone County, Texas.
    ORDER
    Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Hinojosa
    Order Per Curiam
    Appellants’ retained counsel, Chad Morgan, has filed a motion to withdraw as
    counsel. 1    We grant said motion.          Pursuant to Rule 6.5(c) of the Texas Rules of
    1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals in Waco pursuant to a
    docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001
    (West, Westlaw through 2017 R.S.).
    Appellate Procedure, counsel is directed to notify appellants, in writing, of any previously
    undisclosed deadlines and file a copy of that notice with the Clerk of this Court.
    Appellants are directed to notify the Court promptly if they retain new counsel on
    appeal by filing a notice including that attorney’s name, mailing address, email address,
    telephone number, facsimile number, and State Bar of Texas identification number. See
    generally TEX. R. APP. P. 6. In the interim, the Court expects this appeal to proceed as
    per the appellate rules. Appellants are expected to comply with all applicable deadlines
    and filings should comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
    Appellants’ brief is due to be filed in this Court on March 28, 2018. If appellants
    fail to timely file a brief, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See
    TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8.
    It is so ORDERED.
    PER CURIAM
    Delivered and filed this the
    13th cay of March, 2018.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-18-00040-CV

Filed Date: 3/13/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/17/2018