Tanya Marie Cox v. Hunter Webb and Arnold Gerik ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                   IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-17-00373-CV
    TANYA MARIE COX,
    Appellant
    v.
    HUNTER WEBB AND ARNOLD GERIK,
    Appellees
    From the 170th District Court
    McLennan County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2016-1337-4
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    On November 13, 2017, appellant, Tanya Marie Cox, filed a notice of appeal in this
    matter purportedly challenging an order signed by the trial court on October 27, 2017.
    However, attached to her notice of appeal is an order signed by the trial court on October
    16, 2017, whereby the trial court denied traditional and no-evidence motions for
    summary judgment filed by appellee, Arnold Gerik. Additionally, appellant’s notice of
    appeal refers to the trial court cause number as 2016-1337-4.
    Nevertheless, after receiving the Clerk’s Record in this matter, we discovered that,
    in trial court cause number 2016-1337-4, which is the basis for this appeal, the trial court
    granted summary judgment in favor of Gerik on October 27, 2017. However, the trial
    court’s October 27, 2017 order did not dispose of appellant’s claims against co-defendant
    Hunter Webb. As such, the trial court’s October 27, 2017 order entered in trial court cause
    number 2016-1337-4 is not final. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 195 (Tex.
    2001) (noting that an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment); see also Sultan v.
    Mathew, 
    178 S.W.3d 747
    , 751 (Tex. 2005) (“To be final for purposes of appeal, a judgment
    must dispose of all issues and parties in a case.” (internal citation omitted)).
    On February 6, 2018, we notified appellant by letter that this appeal is subject to
    dismissal because appellant appeals from an order that is not final. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    42.3, 44.3. We requested a response from appellant showing grounds for continuing the
    appeal to be filed within twenty-one days of our February 6, 2018 letter. More than
    twenty-one days have passed, and appellant has not filed a response in this case. We
    therefore dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See 
    id. at R.
    42.3; see also 
    Sultan, 178 S.W.3d at 751
    ; 
    Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195
    .
    AL SCOGGINS
    Justice
    Cox v. Webb, et al.                                                                      Page 2
    Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Davis, and
    Justice Scoggins
    Appeal dismissed
    Opinion delivered and filed March 21, 2018
    [CV06]
    Cox v. Webb, et al.                          Page 3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-17-00373-CV

Filed Date: 3/21/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/23/2018