State v. Jason Lambrecht ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                             NUMBER 13-17-00571-CR
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                          Appellant,
    v.
    JASON LAMBRECHT,                                                              Appellee.
    On appeal from the 148th District Court
    of Nueces County, Texas.
    ORDER OF ABATEMENT
    Before Justices Contreras, Longoria, and Hinojosa
    Order Per Curiam
    This cause is before the Court on the State’s second motion to abate the appeal
    for findings of fact and conclusions of law. The State brings this appeal from an order
    granting a motion to suppress entered on October 4, 2017. This matter was abated on
    January 23, 2018, with an order for the trial court to enter its findings of fact and
    conclusions of law. On July 6, 2018, pursuant to this Court’s order, the trial court signed
    its findings of fact and conclusions of law. The appeal was reinstated on July 19, 2018.
    Prior to the trial court’s issuance of its findings of fact and conclusions of law, the State
    submitted to the trial court proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law which
    contained both the State’s position and the defendant’s position, allowing for the trial court
    to choose between the two. However, after a review of the trial court’s entered findings
    of fact and conclusions of law, it would appear that the trial court did not specify which
    was the correct finding or conclusion, and instead signed the State’s proposal as is.
    In State v. Cullen, the Court of Criminal Appeals held that a trial court is required
    to express its findings of fact and conclusions of law when requested by the losing party
    in a motion to suppress. 
    195 S.W.3d 696
    , 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). The trial court
    has twenty days, from the date of its ruling on a motion to suppress, to file findings of fact
    and conclusions of law, if it has not already made oral findings on the record and if the
    non-prevailing party requested findings of fact and conclusions of law. See 
    id. If the
    trial
    court does not enter the findings of fact and conclusions of law within twenty days from
    its ruling on the motion to suppress, the intermediate appellate court must exercise its
    authority under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 44.4, and remand the case to the trial
    court and order the trial court to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. TEX. R.
    APP. P. 44.4(b); 
    Cullen, 195 S.W.3d at 698
    –700.
    The Court, having considered the documents on file and the State’s motion, is of
    the opinion that the State’s motion should be granted. Accordingly, the appeal is ABATED
    and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court with instructions to make and file findings
    of fact and conclusions of law consistent with the holding in Cullen. The trial court shall
    2
    cause a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions to be filed
    with the Clerk of this Court within thirty days from the date of this order. The appeal will
    be reinstated upon receipt of the supplemental clerk’s record and upon further order of
    this Court.
    It is so ORDERED.
    PER CURIAM
    Do not publish.
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Delivered and filed the
    31st day of July, 2018.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-17-00571-CR

Filed Date: 7/31/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2018