Johnathon Ramey v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Affirmed and Opinion Filed September 27, 2018
    S    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-18-00253-CR
    No. 05-18-00254-CR
    JOHNATHON RAMEY, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause Nos. F17-35063-W, F17-35064-W
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lang-Miers
    Opinion by Justice Francis
    Johnathon Ramey waived a jury trial and pleaded guilty to two felony assault family
    violence offenses.    After finding appellant guilty, the trial court assessed punishment at
    imprisonment for six years in each case. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed briefs in which he
    concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirements
    of Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967). The briefs present a professional evaluation of the
    record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    , 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meets
    requirements of Anders). Counsel delivered a copy of the briefs to appellant. We advised appellant
    of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 
    436 S.W.3d 313
    , 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to file pro se response to
    Anders brief filed by counsel).
    We have reviewed the record and counsel’s briefs. See Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    ,
    826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the
    appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support
    the appeals.
    We affirm the trial court’s judgments.
    /Molly Francis/
    MOLLY FRANCIS
    JUSTICE
    Do Not Publish
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47
    180253F.U05
    –2–
    S
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    JOHNATHON RAMEY, Appellant                       On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District
    Court, Dallas County, Texas
    No. 05-18-00253-CR       V.                      Trial Court Cause No. F17-35063-W.
    Opinion delivered by Justice Francis.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                     Justices Bridges and Lang-Miers
    participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
    Judgment entered September 27, 2018.
    –3–
    S
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    JOHNATHON RAMEY, Appellant                       On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District
    Court, Dallas County, Texas
    No. 05-18-00254-CR       V.                      Trial Court Cause No. F17-35064-W.
    Opinion delivered by Justice Francis.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                     Justices Bridges and Lang-Miers
    participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
    Judgment entered September 27, 2018.
    –4–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-18-00253-CR

Filed Date: 9/27/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/1/2018