Jorge Arredondo v. State ( 1999 )


Menu:
  • 
    
    
    
    
    
    

    TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN






    NO. 03-98-00037-CR


    Jorge Arredondo, Appellant


    v.



    The State of Texas, Appellee






    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

    NO. 47,981, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING


    PER CURIAM

    Appellant Jorge Arredondo pleaded guilty to intoxication assault. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.07 (West 1994). After accepting the plea and appellant's judicial confession, the district court adjudged him guilty and assessed punishment at imprisonment for eight years and a $500 fine.

    Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California,

    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
    arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    (1988); High v. State,
    
    573 S.W.2d 807
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 
    516 S.W.2d 684
    (Tex. Crim. App.
    1974); Jackson v. State, 
    485 S.W.2d 553
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 
    436 S.W.2d 137
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant
    was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief
    was filed.

    We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

    The judgment of conviction is affirmed.



    Before Justices Jones, B. A. Smith and Yeakel

    Affirmed

    Filed: May 13, 1999

    Do Not Publish