Jennifer L. Zuniga (Appellant/Cross-Appellee) v. Christopher Medina (Cross-Appellant), Richard Medina, and Shelly Medina ( 2016 )

ACCEPTED
04-14-00360-CV
FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
5/13/2016 12:48:34 PM
KEITH HOTTLE
CLERK
NO. 04-14-00360-CV
IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN
4th COURT OF APPEALS
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
______________________________________________________
5/13/2016 12:48:34 PM
KEITH E. HOTTLE
JENNIFER L. ZUNIGA, Clerk
Appellant/Cross-Appellee
vs.
CHRISTOPHER MEDINA (Cross-Appellant), RICHARD MEDINA AND
SHELLY MEDINA,
Appellees
___________________________________________________
CROSS-APPELLANT’S MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL
_______________________________________________________
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
Comes now Cross-Appellant, CHRISTOPHER MEDINA, and pursuant to Tex. R.
App. P. 8.3 and 4th TEX. APP. (San Antonio) LOC. R. 4, files this Motion to Reinstate
Appeal and in support thereof would show the following:
I.
This is an appeal from a case styled: Jennifer L. Zuniga v. Christopher J. Medina,
Richard Medina and Shelly Medina, Cause No. 2011-CI-10872, filed in the 408th Judicial
District Court, Bexar County, Texas.
II.
The Notice of Appeal was filed on May 30, 2014. Cross-Appellant’s Brief was
filed on October 27, 2014.
1
III.
On October 29, 2014, this Court notified all parties that it had received notice
that appellee and cross-appellant, Christopher Medina, had filed a bankruptcy case in the
Southern District of Texas and the Court entered an order abating this appeal on that date.
IV.
This week, appellate counsel for cross-appellant, Christopher Medina, learned
that the automatic stay was terminated and was not reinstated upon the re-opening of
Christopher Medina’s bankruptcy case. Certified copies of the Motion for Order Under
11 U.S.C.§ 362(j) Confirming Termination of the Automatic Stay and the Bankruptcy
Court’s Order confirming the termination of the stay are attached to this Motion pursuant
to TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3 (Exhibits 1 and 2).
V.
Because the bankruptcy court has terminated the automatic stay, this appeal
should be reinstated, and cross-appellant permitted to pursue his right of appeal.
VI.
The undersigned attempted to communicate by email with Mr. Candelario
Trevino, one of the attorneys for Appellant/Cross-Appellee, on May 13, 2016. Mr.
Trevino has not responded to that email at the time of the filing of this Motion to
Reinstate the Appeal.
WHEREFORE, Cross-Appellant, CHRISTOPHER J. MEDINA, prays that his
Motion to Reinstate Appeal be granted and upon reinstatement this Court allow the
appeal to go forward and establish new briefing deadlines.
2
Respectfully submitted,
/s/Thomas F. Nye___________
Thomas F. Nye
State Bar No. 15154025
Gault, Nye & Quintana, L.L.P.
717 Everhart Road, Suite A
Corpus Christi, Texas 78411
(361) 654-7008 Telephone
(361) 654-7001 Telecopier
ATTORNEYS FOR CROSS-APPELLANT
CHRISTOPHER J. MEDINA
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I, Linda Breck, certify that I attempted to communicate with Mr. Candelario
Trevino by email on May 13, 2016. Mr. Candelario Trevino is one of the attorneys for
Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Mr. Trevino has not yet responded to the email at the time of
the filing of this Motion to Reinstate Appeal.
/s/Linda C. Breck _________
Linda C. Breck
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that the above and foregoing instrument has been forwarded to
counsel as indicated below on this the 13th day of May, 2016:
3
Candelario S. Trevino, Jr.
Gene Toscano, Inc.
846 Culebra Road, Suite 104
San Antonio, Texas 78201
Via Filing: ctrevino@genetoscano.com
/s/Linda C. Breck _
Linda C. Breck
4
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
INRE: §
§
CHRISTOPHER JOHN MEDINA, § CASE NO. 1.4-35711-H4-7
§ (Chapter 7)
Debtor, §
MOTION FOR ORDER UNDER 11 U.S.C. § 362(j)
CONFIRMING THE TERMINATION OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY
TO TH E HONORABLE J EFF BOHM, U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE:
COMES NOW, JANET S. NORTHRUP, Chapter 7 Trustee (the "Trustee") makes this
her Motion fo r Order under 1 I U.S.C. § 3620) Confirming Termination of the Automatic Stay.
In further support for the Motion, the Trustee would show the court as follows:
I.
Jurisdiction and Venue
I. This Court has jurisdiction over this Motion pursuant to 28 U.S .C. § 1334. This Court
may hear and determine this motion under 28 U.S.C. § 157. The Motion is a core proceeding
under 28 U.S.C. § l 57(b)(2)(A), (G) and (0). Venue over this proceeding is proper under 28
U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409. This Court has constituti onal authority to enter a final order in this
mt1tter. If it does not, the Trustee consents to entry of a final order in this matter.
II.
Factual Background
2. On October 15, 2014 (the " Petition Date"), the Debtor filed for relief under Chapter 7
of the Bankruptcy Code (the " Bankruptcy") in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas.
1'RUr. L(lY'i i {.l.i:
1 Fi
ATTEST:S-- ID~ { pate~ #of pages
EXHIBIT DAVID J. BRADLEY, Clerk of Court
I" l Bv Wdn~IL I ~ 1=--
neputyeri
3. On January I 3, 2015, thfa court entered a Final Decree in this bankruptcy case closing
the case
4. On February 11 , 20 I 5, Jennifer Zuniga, creditor in the above-captioned bankruptcy
case, filed a motion to reopen the bankruptcy case. Th is Court reopened the bankruptcy case on
April 12, 2015 and the Trustee was reappointed on Apri l 9, 2015 .
5. The Trustee seeks to administer litigation assets belonging to the bankruptcy estate,
and therefore requests an order under 11 U.S.C. § 362(j) confirming that the automatic stay has
been terminated.
III.
Relief Reg uested
6. Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 362(j), the Trustee requests that th is Court
enter an order confirming that the automatic stay has been terminated .
IV.
Basis for Relief
7. l I U.S.C. 362(j) states that on request of a party in interest, the court shal l issue an
order under subsection (c) confirming that the automatic stay has been term inated.
8. The automatic stay provided by 11 U.S.C. 362(a) expires upon the closing of a cause
pursuant to 362(c)(2)(A). Accordingly , the stay has expired, and reopening the case wi ll not
automatically cause the automatic stay to become effective again. In re Brun?fiel, 514 B.R. 637,
643 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2014) (hold ing that the automatic stay is not reinstated in reopened cases
and noting that re-o pening a bankruptcy case, which may be accomplished on limited notice, does
not bear the s ignificance that filing a petition does); In re Frazer/Exton Dev., l.P., 503 B.R. 620
(Bankr. E.D. Pa.2013 ) (holding that reopening ·'is a ministerial act that has no substantive effect
2
in and of itself'); see also In re Burke, 198 B.R. 412 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 1996); In re Trevino, 78
B.R. 29 (Bankr. M.D . Pa. 1987). The Fifth Circuit referenced a clarifying order noting that the
automatic stay is terminated in a reopened chapter 7 bankruptcy case in Hosack v. IR....<:; (In re
Hosack) , 282 Fed . App'x 309. 311 n.4 (5 1h Cir. 2008).
9. The Trustee has therefore shown that the automatic stay has terminated pursuant to 11
U.S.C. § 362(c)(2)(A).
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONS IDERED, the Trustee respectfully requests that the
Court enter an Order confirming that the automatic stay has terminated and grant such other and
further rel ief to which the Trustee may show herself entitled.
DATED: September 2, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
WA USON + PROBUS
By: Isl Matthew B. Probus
Matthew B. Probus
State Bar No. 16341200 / ID# l 0915
mbprobus(aiw-plaw.com
Jarrod M artin
State Bar No. #24070221 I lD# 2374739
jmat.1.i!J.@ W-p]a\V.~.mll
One Sugar Creek Center B lvd., Suite 880
Sugar Land, Texas 77478
(2 81) 242-0303 (Telephone)
(281) 242-0306 (Facsimj)e)
PROPOSED COUNSEL TO JANET NORTHRUP,
CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE.
3
Certificate of Service
T hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument has been served
upon the parties on the attached serv ice list on this 2"d day of September, 2015, via United States
regular mail, postage paid first class and via the Court's ECF/PACER system:
Isl Matthew B. Probus
Matthew B. Probus
4
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
INRE: §
§
CHRISTOPHER JOHN MEDINA, § CASE NO. 14-35711-84-7
§ (Chapter 7)
Debtor, §
ORDER
CAME ON T HIS DAY, the Trustee's Joint Motion for Order under 11 U.S.C. 362U)
Confirming the Termination of the Automatic Stay. After considering the M otion, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that on January 13, 2015, the automatic stay was termjnated as to
Christopher John Medina pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §362(c)(2)(A); and it is further:
ORDERED that the automatic stay remains terminated and was not reinstated upon the
reopening of Christopher John Medina's bankruptcy case.
S1GNED, this _ __ __ day of _ __ _ _ _ _ _, 2015.
JUDGE JEFF BOHM,
U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
Case 14-35711 Document 35-1 Filed in TXSB on 09/02/15
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVlSION
INRE: §
§
CHRISTOPHER JOHN MEDINA, § CASE NO. 14-35711-H4-7
§ (Chapter 7)
Debtor, §
ffl
CAME ON THIS DAY, the Trustee's~ fnt Motion for Order under I 1 U.S.C. 3620)
Confirming the Termination of the Automatic Stay. After considering the Motion, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that on January 13, 2015, the automatic stay was terminated as to
Christopher John Medina pursuant to l I U.S.C. §362(c)(2)(A); and it is further:
ORDERED that the automatic stay remains terminated and was not reinstated upon the
reopening of Christopher John Medina's bankruptcy case.
SIGNED, th;, 2'1,J'I,. day of J erf: , 2015.
JUDGE JEFF BOHM,
U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
TRUh O J Y!'. ~ :,RT .Fi
ATTES~ S - 1.~ ~a~o l#'of pages
DAVID J. BRADLEY. Cls"fl<. {Sf Cowt
EXHIBIT
By Wflh {\ c,__ \ ctuU b
I 2.. Deputy Cler..'t