Luis Sanchez v. Matthew Whitaker ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 18-1208
    LUIS A. SANCHEZ,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
    Submitted: November 13, 2018                                Decided: November 21, 2018
    Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, Maryland, for
    Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Song Park, Senior
    Litigation Counsel, Brendan P. Hogan, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division,
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Luis A. Sanchez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of an order
    of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed
    Sanchez’s claims in conjunction with the administrative record. We conclude that the
    Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion because Sanchez failed to show
    that the new evidence he provided was previously unavailable. See 
    8 C.F.R. § 1003.2
    (c)(1)
    (2018); Onyeme v. INS, 
    146 F.3d 227
    , 234 (4th Cir. 1998).             Further, under these
    circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s discretionary decision not to
    reopen sua sponte. See 
    8 C.F.R. § 1003.2
    (a) (2018); Mosere v. Mukasey, 
    552 F.3d 397
    ,
    400–01 (4th Cir. 2009). We find that Sanchez’s remaining claims are without merit.
    Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-1208

Filed Date: 11/21/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/21/2018