Karen Wakefield v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Order filed March 5, 2013
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    ____________
    NO. 14-12-00686-CV
    ____________
    KAREN WAKEFIELD, Appellant
    V.
    WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee
    On Appeal from the 129th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 2011-59422
    ORDER
    Appellant’s brief was filed on February 25, 2013. The Court has determined
    that appellant has not properly presented this cause in his brief on file. Appellant
    failed to substantially comply with Rule 38 of the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure.   In particular, appellant has failed to provide a clear and concise
    argument for each contention made with appropriate citations to the record and to
    authority. Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(f), (h).
    Litigants who appear pro se must comply with the applicable procedural
    rules and are held to the same standards that apply to licensed attorneys. See
    Mansfield State Bank v. Cohn, 
    573 S.W.2d 181
    , 185 (Tex. 1978); Steffan v. Steffan,
    
    29 S.W.3d 627
    , 631 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. denied).
    Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 38.9(b), the court orders appellant to file a corrected
    brief complying with the rules of appellate procedure on or before April 4, 2013.
    See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(b). If appellant fails to file his brief on or before April 4,
    2013, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P.
    42.3(b).
    PER CURIAM
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-12-00686-CV

Filed Date: 3/5/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/23/2015