Ronnii J. Wallace v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • MEMORANDUM DECISION
    Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),
    this Memorandum Decision shall not be
    FILED
    regarded as precedent or cited before any                                     Apr 30 2019, 11:29 am
    court except for the purpose of establishing                                       CLERK
    Indiana Supreme Court
    the defense of res judicata, collateral                                           Court of Appeals
    and Tax Court
    estoppel, or the law of the case.
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT                                    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
    Randall J. Hammond                                        Curtis T. Hill, Jr.
    Deputy Public Defender                                    Attorney General
    Leonard, Hammond, Thoma & Terrill
    Fort Wayne, Indiana                                       Caroline G. Templeton
    Deputy Attorney General
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    IN THE
    COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
    Ronnii J. Wallace,                                        April 30, 2019
    Appellant-Defendant/Cross-Appellee,                       Court of Appeals Case No.
    19A-CR-9
    v.                                                Appeal from the Allen Superior
    Court
    State of Indiana,                                         The Honorable Frances C. Gull,
    Appellee-Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant                        Judge
    Trial Court Cause No.
    02D06-1804-F6-380
    Crone, Judge.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-9 | April 30, 2019                            Page 1 of 3
    Case Summary
    [1]   Ronnii J. Wallace appeals the one-year aggregate sentence imposed by the trial
    court following his convictions for level 6 felony possession of cocaine, class B
    misdemeanor possession of marijuana, and class C misdemeanor operating a
    vehicle without ever receiving a license. On cross-appeal, the State argues that
    Wallace failed to file a timely notice of appeal and thus forfeited the right to
    appeal. We agree with the State and therefore dismiss.
    Facts and Procedural History
    [2]   On July 16, 2018, Wallace pled guilty to level 6 felony possession of cocaine,
    class B misdemeanor possession of marijuana, and class C misdemeanor
    operating a vehicle without ever receiving a license. He was accepted into the
    Allen County drug court program. On October 1, 2018, the trial court revoked
    his placement and ordered a presentence investigation report. On November 1,
    2018, the trial court sentenced Wallace to concurrent terms of one year for the
    level 6 felony, 183 days for the class B misdemeanor, and 60 days for the class
    C misdemeanor. The sentencing order was noted in the chronological case
    summary (“CCS”) that same day. The trial court appointed appellate counsel
    to represent Wallace, and counsel filed his appearance on November 6, 2018.
    A notice of appeal was not filed on Wallace’s behalf until January 3, 2019,
    sixty-three days after the trial court issued the sentencing order.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-9 | April 30, 2019   Page 2 of 3
    Discussion and Decision
    [3]   On cross-appeal, the State raises an issue that we find dispositive: whether
    Wallace has forfeited his right to appeal his sentence by failing to timely file his
    notice of appeal. “A party initiates an appeal by filing a Notice of Appeal with
    the Clerk [of the Indiana Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and Tax Court]
    within thirty (30) days after the entry of a Final Judgment is noted in the
    Chronological Case Summary.” Ind. Appellate Rule 9(A)(1). “Unless the
    Notice of Appeal is timely filed, the right to appeal shall be forfeited except as
    provided by [Post-Conviction Rule] 2[,]” which does not apply here. Ind.
    Appellate Rule 9(A)(5).
    [4]   Here, the trial court’s sentencing order was noted in the CCS on November 1,
    2018. The notice of appeal was not filed until January 3, 2019, which was more
    than a month past the deadline imposed by the Indiana Appellate Rules. Thus,
    Wallace forfeited his right to appeal his sentence. Upon forfeiture, the right to
    appeal may be restored if extraordinarily compelling reasons are present. In re
    Adoption of O.R., 
    16 N.E.3d 965
    , 971 (Ind. 2014). Wallace’s appellate counsel
    did not file a reply brief to offer such reasons, and, based upon the record before
    us, we find no such reasons to review the merits of the trial court’s discretionary
    sentencing decision. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
    [5]   Dismissed.
    Bradford, J., and Tavitas, J., concur.
    Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-9 | April 30, 2019   Page 3 of 3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19A-CR-9

Filed Date: 4/30/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/30/2019