Ex Parte: Archie Williams v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • DISMISSED and Opinion Filed December 16, 2016
    S   In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-16-00870-CR
    EX PARTE ARCHIE WILLIAMS
    On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court
    Rockwall County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause Nos. 2-15-162, 2-15-502, 2-16-0307, 2-16-0308
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Lang, Brown, and Whitehill
    Opinion by Justice Whitehill
    This case is REINSTATED.
    The records in this cause and companion cause no. 05-16-00877-CR reveal the following
    procedural history.   In trial court cause no. 2-15-162, Archie Williams was indicted for
    tampering with evidence. Subsequently, in trial court cause no. 2-15-502, he was charged with
    assault of a public servant. On June 23, 2016, appellant filed a pretrial application for writ of
    habeas corpus contending he was entitled to release in both cases under article 17.151 of the
    code of criminal procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 17.151, § 1 (West 2015)
    (requiring trial court to either release accused on personal recognizance or else effectuate his
    release by reducing pretrial bail when State is not ready for trial within prescribed time period).
    On June 29, 2016, the State reindicted appellant on both charges with the new cases being
    assigned trial court cause nos. 2-16-0307 and 2-16-0308.
    On July 5, 2016, the trial court conducted an arraignment hearing on the reindicted cases
    and, at the same time, heard brief testimony and argument about appellant’s request for article
    17.151 relief. The trial court orally denied relief.
    On July 18–20, 2016, appellant was tried before a jury on the reindicted tampering charge
    in cause no. 2-16-0307. The jury convicted appellant and it assessed punishment at twenty
    years’ imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. On July 20, 2016, the trial court granted the State’s
    motion to dismiss cause no. 2-15-162 on the ground the charge therein had been reindicted as
    cause no. 2-16-0307.
    On July 22, 2016, appellant filed a notice of appeal to challenge the trial court’s order
    denying relief on his pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus and a separate notice of appeal
    to contest the trial court’s judgment in the tampering case tried under cause no. 2-16-0307. The
    habeas appeal was assigned appellate court cause no. 05-16-00870-CR. The appeal of the
    conviction in cause no. 2-16-0307 was assigned appellate cause no. 05-16-00877-CR. On
    August 2, 2016, the trial court entered a written order denying the pretrial application for writ of
    habeas corpus. The trial court’s order denied relief on all four of appellant’s charged case
    numbers: 2-15-162, 2-15-502, 2-16-0307, and 2-16-0308. On August 30, 2016, appellant’s trial
    counsel, Antonius B. Massar, filed an affidavit with the Court in cause no. 05-16-00870-CR that
    averred, among other items, that the trial court had dismissed the assault case against appellant
    on July 20, 2016—the same date appellant was convicted in the tampering case. Appellant has
    filed two letters with this Court to inform the Court of his state prison mailing address.
    –2–
    By order entered on September 14, 2016, the Court abated this appeal pending receipt
    and review of the appellate record in cause no. 05-16-00877-CR.1 The records filed in cause nos.
    05-16-00870-CR and 05-16-00877-CR show that appellant is no longer subject to pretrial
    detention and, therefore, the appeal in cause no. 05-16-00870-CR is moot. See Martinez v. State,
    
    826 S.W.2d 620
    , 620 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) (court would not address merits of petition
    complaining about pretrial detention when appellant had been convicted of underlying offense
    rendering the petition moot); Danziger v. State, 
    786 S.W.2d 723
    , 724 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)
    (per curiam) (appeal of pretrial detention rendered moot by conviction of offense).
    We DISMISS this appeal.
    /Bill Whitehill/
    BILL WHITEHILL
    JUSTICE
    Do Not Publish
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47
    160870F.U05
    1
    Because cause no. 05-16-00870-CR is an accelerated appeal while cause no. 05-16-00877-CR is a regular appeal, the dates to file the
    clerk’s and reporter’s records were on different time tracks.
    –3–
    S
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    EX PARTE ARCHIE WILLIAMS                       On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District
    Court, Rockwall County, Texas
    No. 05-16-00870-CR                             Trial Court Cause Nos. 2-15-16, 2-15-502,
    2-16-0307, 2-16-0308.
    Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill.
    Justices Lang and Brown participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
    Judgment entered December 16, 2016.
    –4–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-16-00870-CR

Filed Date: 12/16/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/19/2016