Truman Tommy Matthews v. State of Texas ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •                                   NO. 07-01-0147-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    AT AMARILLO
    PANEL C
    NOVEMBER 6, 2001
    ______________________________
    TRUMAN TOMMY MATTHEWS
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    _________________________________
    FROM THE 155th DISTRICT COURT OF WALLER COUNTY;
    NO. 98-05-9372; HON. DAN R. BECK, PRESIDING
    _______________________________
    ABATEMENT AND REMAND
    _______________________________
    Before QUINN, REAVIS, and JOHNSON, JJ.
    Truman Tommy Matthews (appellant) appeals his conviction for murder. Both the
    clerk’s and court reporter’s records were filed by September 20, 2001. Thus, appellant’s
    brief was due on October 22, 2001. However, one was not filed on that date. By letter
    dated October 26, 2001, we notified appellant’s counsel, Kristine C. Woldy, of the expired
    deadline and directed her to respond to our notification of same by Monday, November 5,
    2001, or the appeal would be abated to the trial court pursuant to TEX . R. APP . P. 38.8.
    November 5, 2001 came and went without any response by counsel to our notice, without
    counsel tendering a brief, and without counsel filing a motion for extension of time to file
    a brief.
    Consequently, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 155th District
    Court of Waller County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court
    shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing
    to determine the following:
    1.     whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and
    2.     whether appellant is indigent;
    3.     whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel due
    to counsel’s failure to timely file a brief. See Evitts v. Lucey, 
    469 U.S. 387
    ,
    394, 
    105 S. Ct. 830
    , 834-35, 
    83 L. Ed. 2d 821
    , 828 (1985) (holding that an
    indigent defendant is entitled to the effective assistance of counsel on the
    first appeal as of right and that counsel must be available to assist in
    preparing and submitting an appellate brief).
    We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law
    addressing the foregoing subjects. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to
    pursue this appeal, is indigent, and was denied effective assistance of counsel, then we
    further direct the court to appoint new counsel to assist in the prosecution of the appeal.
    The name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new
    counsel who will represent appellant on appeal must also be included in the court’s
    findings of fact and conclusions of law. Furthermore, the trial court shall also cause to be
    2
    developed: 1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions
    of law and 2) a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the
    aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk’s
    record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before December 6, 2001.     Should
    additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or
    before December 6, 2001.
    It is so ordered.
    Per Curiam
    Do not publish.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-01-00147-CR

Filed Date: 11/6/2001

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015