Bobby W. Willard v. State ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                                     NO. 07-05-0232-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    AT AMARILLO
    PANEL A
    JULY 19, 2005
    ______________________________
    BOBBY W. WILLARD, APPELLANT
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
    _________________________________
    FROM THE 364TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
    NO. 99-430419; HON. BRADLEY S. UNDERWOOD, PRESIDING
    _______________________________
    Before REAVIS, CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant, Bobby W. Willard, appeals from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s
    motion for DNA testing. We dismiss the proceeding for lack of jurisdiction.
    The order from which appellant is appealing was signed on May 3, 2005. Appellant
    then filed a notice of appeal on June 14, 2005. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be
    filed within 30 days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or within 90
    days after that date if a motion for new trial is filed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). No motion for
    new trial having been filed, appellant's notice of appeal was due to be filed by June 2, 2005.
    Because the record discloses that the notice of appeal was received by the clerk on June
    14, 2005, Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b), without seeking an extension of the deadline, Tex. R. App.
    P. 26.3, the notice of appeal was late.
    A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Olivo
    v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). If it is untimely, we can take no
    action other than to dismiss the proceeding. 
    Id. at 523.
    Appellant's notice being untimely
    filed, we have no jurisdiction over the matter and dismiss the appeal.
    Per Curiam
    Do not publish.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-05-00232-CR

Filed Date: 7/19/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015