in Re Bobby W. Willard, Relator ( 2005 )


Menu:
  • NO. 07-05-0256-CV

      

    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

      

    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

      

    AT AMARILLO

      

    PANEL A

      

    JULY 18, 2005

    ______________________________

      

      

    IN RE BOBBY W. WILLARD, RELATOR

      

    _______________________________

      

    Before REAVIS, CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

      

      

    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

      

      

    By this original proceeding, relator Bobby W. Willard, acting pro se (footnote: 1) and in forma pauperis , seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the judge of the 364 th District Court of Lubbock County, to rule on motions for “recusal, to compel disclosure of prior DNA autoradiograph results or sanction.”  We deny the petition.

    Rule 52.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure prescribes the mandatory contents for a petition for mandamus.  Specifically, relator has failed to comply with subparagraphs (b), (c), (e), (f), (i) and (j) of Rule 52.3.  Rule 52.7 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure prescribes the record to be filed with the petition for mandamus.  Specifically, relator has failed to comply with subparagraph (a)(1) of Rule 52.7.  Thus, because relator has not complied with the requirements of Rule 52 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we deny the petition.

      

    Mackey K. Hancock

             Justice

    FOOTNOTES

    1:

    A pro se litigant is held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and must comply with applicable laws and rules of procedure.   Holt v. F.F. Enterprises, 990 S.W.2d 756, 759 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 1998, no pet.).

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-05-00256-CV

Filed Date: 7/18/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015