Matthew Garcia v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                                 Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-18-00925-CR
    Matthew GARCIA,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2018-CR-5816
    Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:           Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
    Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
    Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: January 16, 2019
    DISMISSED
    The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain
    case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain,
    and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and
    agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the
    underlying case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
    Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be
    dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part
    04-18-00925-CR
    of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). On December 5, 2018, we ordered that
    this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification
    showing that the appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record by January
    4, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 
    154 S.W.3d 610
    (Tex. Crim.
    App. 2005); Daniels v. State, 
    110 S.W.3d 174
    (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). No
    response was filed. 1 In the absence of an amended trial court certification showing that the
    appellant has the right of appeal, rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal.
    Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
    PER CURIAM
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    1
    Garcia filed a pro se document entitled “Explanation and Grounds of Appeal on Negotiated Plea.” Because Garcia
    is represented by appointed counsel on appeal and is not entitled to hybrid representation, the pro se document
    “present[s] nothing for review.” Rudd v. State, 
    616 S.W.2d 623
    , 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981).
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-18-00925-CR

Filed Date: 1/16/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/17/2019