Brandon Kyrell Jeffery v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • DISMISS; and Opinion Filed April 5, 2019.
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-19-00129-CR
    BRANDON KYRELL JEFFERY, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court
    Grayson County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 068488
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Pedersen, III
    Opinion by Justice Brown
    Brandon Kyrell Jeffery appeals his conviction for manslaughter. Appellant was indicted
    for murder and manslaughter. He pleaded guilty to manslaughter in exchange for the State’s
    agreement to dismiss the murder charge. The trial court found appellant guilty and assessed
    punishment at ten years in prison. Appellant then filed his notice of appeal with this Court.
    After reviewing appellant’s notice of appeal, the trial court’s certification of appellant’s
    right to appeal, and the details of his conviction, we had questions regarding our jurisdiction. By
    letter dated February 7, 2019, we informed the parties that it appeared appellant had waived his
    right to appeal and asked that they file letter briefs regarding the jurisdictional issue. Appellant’s
    trial counsel responded, informing the Court that while he did not disagree with our preliminary
    conclusion, he had withdrawn from the case at appellant’s request. The State did not respond.
    The clerk’s record shows that appellant was indicted on two counts: murder and
    manslaughter. Appellant agreed to plead guilty to count 2, manslaughter, in exchange for the
    State’s agreement to dismiss count 1, the murder charge. The trial court admonished appellant in
    writing that if he pleaded guilty under a plea bargain agreement with the State and the trial court
    followed the plea bargain, appellant would not be allowed to appeal his conviction “except for
    those matter, if any, raised by written motions filed and ruled on by the Court prior to trial.”
    Appellant, appellant’s trial counsel, the district attorney, and the trial court signed the agreement.
    The clerk’s record also shows that no substantive written motions were filed or ruled on by the
    trial court prior to the hearing on appellant’s pleas. The trial court then followed the plea bargain
    agreement, found appellant guilty, and assessed punishment. The trial court certified that this was
    a plea-bargain case and appellant had no right to appeal.
    A defendant in a plea bargain case‒that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or
    nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the
    prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant‒may appeal only (1) matters that were raised by written
    motion filed and ruled on before trial or (2) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.
    TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). There are two basic kinds of plea-bargaining: charge-bargaining and
    sentence-bargaining. Shankle v. State, 
    119 S.W.3d 808
    , 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Charge-
    bargaining involves whether a defendant will plead guilty to the offense that has been alleged or
    to a lesser or related offense, and whether the prosecutor will dismiss, or refrain from bringing,
    other charges. 
    Id. Sentence-bargaining may
    be for binding or non-binding recommendations to
    the court on sentences, including a recommended “cap” on sentencing and a recommendation for
    deferred-adjudication probation. 
    Id. Here, appellant
    entered into a charge plea-bargain with the State when he agreed to plead
    guilty to manslaughter in exchange for the State dismissing the murder charge. As previously
    –2–
    noted, no substantive written motions were filed or ruled on by the trial court prior to the hearing
    on appellant’s plea, and the trial court did not give permission to appeal. Thus, we conclude
    appellant waived his right to appeal; in other words, he has no right to appeal. TEX. R. APP. P.
    25.2(a)(2).
    We dismiss this appeal.
    /Ada Brown/
    ADA BROWN
    JUSTICE
    Do Not Publish
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
    190129F.U05
    –3–
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    BRANDON KYRELL JEFFERY,                              On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District
    Appellant                                            Court, Grayson County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 068488.
    No. 05-19-00129-CR         V.                        Opinion delivered by Justice Brown.
    Justices Schenck and Pedersen, III
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                         participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.
    Judgment entered this 5th day of April, 2019.
    –4–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-19-00129-CR

Filed Date: 4/5/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/8/2019