Paul Charles Neatherlin, Jr. v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                                      In The
    Court of Appeals
    Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
    No. 07-19-00123-CR
    No. 07-19-00124-CR
    No. 07-19-00125-CR
    PAUL CHARLES NEATHERLIN, JR., APPELLANT
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
    On Appeal from the 385th District Court
    Midland County, Texas
    Trial Court Nos. CR48092, CR48259, & CR49181, Honorable Robert H. Moore, III, Presiding
    April 12, 2019
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.
    In 2017, appellant Paul Charles Neatherlin, Jr. was convicted of possession of a
    controlled substance,1 fraudulent use or possession of identifying information,2 and failure
    to appear in accordance with the terms of his release.3 He was sentenced to ten years’
    1   TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(c) (West 2017).
    2   TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 32.51(c)(2) (West 2016).
    3   TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 38.10(f) (West 2016).
    imprisonment for each conviction, but his sentences were suspended in favor of
    community supervision for five years. On February 15, 2019, the trial court revoked
    appellant’s community supervision and imposed the original sentences. Appellant filed a
    notice of appeal from each conviction in the Eleventh Court of Appeals. The appeals
    were subsequently transferred to this court by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX.
    GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013). We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.
    The timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to
    hearing an appeal. Castillo v. State, 
    369 S.W.3d 196
    , 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). In a
    criminal case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is
    imposed or within ninety days after sentence is imposed if the defendant timely files a
    motion for new trial. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). This deadline can be extended if, within
    fifteen days of the deadline, appellant files a notice of appeal and a motion for extension
    of time. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. When a notice of appeal but no motion for extension of
    time is filed within the fifteen-day extension period, an appellate court lacks jurisdiction to
    dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of
    jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
    The trial court revoked appellant’s community supervision and sentenced
    appellant on February 15, 2019. Because no motion for new trial was filed, appellant’s
    notice of appeal was due within thirty days after the sentences were imposed, by March
    18, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1), 4.1(a). Appellant filed his notices of appeal on
    March 25, 2019, within the fifteen-day extension period, but did not file a motion for
    extension of time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. By letter of March 28, the Eleventh Court of
    Appeals notified appellant that his notices of appeal were filed untimely and that the
    2
    appeals could be dismissed if he did not file a motion for extension of time within the
    fifteen-day extension period, by April 2. Appellant did not file a motion for extension or
    respond to the court’s letter.
    Because appellant’s untimely filed notices of appeal prevent this court from
    acquiring jurisdiction over the appeals, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.
    Per Curiam
    Do not publish.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-19-00123-CR

Filed Date: 4/12/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/15/2019