Roger Winston Milam v. State ( 2005 )

Opinion issued February 3, 2005

In The

Court of Appeals

For The  

First District of Texas

____________

NOS. 01-04-01192-CR

          01-04-01193-CR

          01-04-01194-CR

          01-04-01195-CR

          01-04-01196-CR

          01-04-01197-CR

          01-04-01198-CR

          01-04-01199-CR

____________

ROGER MILAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

---

  On Appeal from the 400th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 40682, 40683, 40684, 40685, 40686, 40687, 40688, and 40689  

---

MEMORANDUM OPINION  

           On January 21, 2005, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the above-referenced appeals. The motion complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

          We have not yet issued a decision. Accordingly, the motion is granted and the appeals are dismissed.

          Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file late notice of appeal is denied as moot.

          The Clerk of this Court is directed to issue the mandates immediately. Tex. R. App. P. 18.1.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Higley and Bland.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).